Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix

被引:237
作者
Guerzoni, Marco [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Raiteri, Emilio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, Dept Econ & Stat Cognetti de Martiis, I-10124 Turin, Italy
[2] Coll Carlo Alberto, BRICK, Moncalieri, TO, Italy
[3] Bocconi Univ, CRIOS, Milan, Italy
关键词
R&D subsidies; Public procurement; Crowding-out; Confounding effect; Hidden treatment; Propensity score matching; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; PROPENSITY SCORE; DEVELOPMENT SUBSIDIES; MARKET-STRUCTURE; TAX CREDIT; INNOVATION; IMPACT; ADDITIONALITY; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper provides new empirical evidence about the impact of various technological policies upon firms' innovative behaviour. We take into consideration the role of policies for innovative activities and we focus on their interaction. While supply-side policies such as R&D subsidies and tax credits have been both extensively discussed in the literature and empirically investigated, the analysis of innovative public procurement is a growing trend in the literature, which still lacks robust empirical evidence. In this paper, we replicate the existing results on supply-side policies, surmise fresh empirical evidence on the outcome of innovative public procurement, and address the issue of possible interaction among the various tools. When controlling for the interaction with other policies, supply-side subsidies cease to be as effective as reported in previous studies and innovative public procurement seems to be more effective than other tools. The preliminary evidence suggests that technology policies exert the highest impact when different policies interact. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:726 / 747
页数:22
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany [J].
Aerts, Kris ;
Schmidt, Tobias .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (05) :806-822
[2]  
Aho E., 2006, CREATING INNOVATION
[3]   The effects of public R&D subsidies on firms' innovation activities: The case of Eastern Germany [J].
Almus, M ;
Czarnitzki, D .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2003, 21 (02) :226-236
[4]  
Angrist JD, 2009, MOSTLY HARMLESS ECONOMETRICS: AN EMPIRICISTS COMPANION, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SOURCES INNOVATION
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Diffusion of innovations
[7]  
[Anonymous], 0477 ZEW
[9]   Innovation on demand-Can public procurement drive market success of innovations? [J].
Aschhoff, Birgit ;
Sofka, Wolfgang .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (08) :1235-1247
[10]   Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spanish manufacturing firms [J].
Blanes, JV ;
Busom, I .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2004, 33 (10) :1459-1476