Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy for stage I and II breast cancer: Pooled results of two large European randomized trials

被引:415
作者
Voogd, AC
Nielsen, M
Peterse, JL
Blichert-Toft, M
Bartelink, H
Overgaard, M
van Tienhoven, G
Andersen, KW
Sylvester, RJ
van Dongen, JA
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Eindhoven Canc Registry, Dept Pathol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Eindhoven Canc Registry, Dept Radiat Oncol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Netherlands Canc Inst, Eindhoven Canc Registry, Dept Surg, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[4] Acad Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Rigshosp, Dept Pathol, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[6] Rigshosp, Dept Surg, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[7] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
[8] European Org Res & Treatment Canc Data Ctr, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2001.19.6.1688
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy were compared to define guidelines for the decision making between both treatments. Patients and Methods: The data of two randomized clinical trials for stage I and II breast cancer patients were pooled. The total number of patients in the study was 1,772, of whom 879 underwent breast conservation, and 893, modified radical mastectomy. Representative slides of the primary tumor were available for histopathologic review in 1,610 cases (91%). Results: There were 79 patients with local recurrence after breast-conservation and 80 after mastectomy, the 10-year rates being 10% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8% to 13%) and 9% (95% CI, 7% to 12%), respectively. Age no more than 35 years (compared with age >60: hazard ratio [HR], 9.24; 95% CI, 3.74 to 22.81) and an extensive intraductal component (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.26 to 5.00) were significantly associated with an increased risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. Vascular invasion was predictive of the risk of local recurrence, irrespective of the type of primary treatment (P <.01). Tumor size, nodal status, high histologic grade, and vascular invasion were all highly significant predictors of distant disease after breast-conserving therapy and mastectomy (P <.01). Age no more than 35 years and microscopic involvement of the excision margin were additional independent predictors of distant disease after breast-conserving therapy (P <.01). Conclusion: Age no more than 35 years and the presence of an extensive intraductal component are associated with an increased risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy. Vascular invasion causes a higher risk of local recurrence after mastectomy as well as after breast conserving therapy and should therefore not be used for deciding between the two treatments. <(c)> 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1688 / 1697
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
ABE O, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V333, P1444
[2]   LOCAL FAILURE AND MARGIN STATUS IN EARLY-STAGE BREAST-CARCINOMA TREATED WITH CONSERVATION SURGERY AND RADIATION-THERAPY [J].
ANSCHER, MS ;
JONES, P ;
PROSNITZ, LR ;
BLACKSTOCK, W ;
HEBERT, M ;
REDDICK, R ;
TUCKER, A ;
DODGE, R ;
LEIGHT, G ;
IGLEHART, JD ;
ROSENMAN, J .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (01) :22-28
[3]  
Blichert-Toft M, 1992, J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, P19
[4]   RISK-FACTORS IN BREAST-CONSERVATION THERAPY [J].
BORGER, J ;
KEMPERMAN, H ;
HART, A ;
PETERSE, H ;
VANDONGEN, J ;
BARTELINK, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1994, 12 (04) :653-660
[5]   LOCAL-CONTROL AND SURVIVAL OF BREAST-CANCER TREATED BY LIMITED SURGERY FOLLOWED BY IRRADIATION [J].
CALLE, R ;
VILCOQ, JR ;
ZAFRANI, P ;
VIELH, P ;
FOURQUET, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1986, 12 (06) :873-878
[6]   THE IMPORTANCE OF HISTOLOGIC GRADE IN LONG-TERM PROGNOSIS OF BREAST-CANCER - A STUDY OF 1,010 PATIENTS, UNIFORMLY TREATED AT THE INSTITUT-GUSTAVE-ROUSSY [J].
CONTESSO, G ;
MOURIESSE, H ;
FRIEDMAN, S ;
GENIN, J ;
SARRAZIN, D ;
ROUESSE, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (09) :1378-1386
[7]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[8]   AGE AS PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN PREMENOPAUSAL BREAST-CARCINOMA [J].
DELAROCHEFORDIERE, A ;
ASSELAIN, B ;
CAMPANA, F ;
SCHOLL, SM ;
FENTON, J ;
VILCOQ, JR ;
DURAND, JC ;
POUILLART, P ;
MAGDELENAT, H ;
FOURQUET, A .
LANCET, 1993, 341 (8852) :1039-1043
[9]  
DEWAR JA, 1995, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V76, P2260, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19951201)76:11<2260::AID-CNCR2820761113>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-D