Refinement of the association of serum C-reactive protein concentration and coronary heart disease risk by correction for within-subject variation over time

被引:104
作者
Koenig, W
Sund, M
Fröhlich, M
Löwel, H
Hutchinson, WL
Pepys, MB
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Dept Internal Med Cardiol 2, Med Ctr, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[2] GSF Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Inst Epidemiol, Neuherberg, Germany
[3] GSF Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, MEDIS Inst, Neuherberg, Germany
[4] UCL Royal Free & Univ Coll Med Sch, Ctr Amyloidosis & Acute Phase Prot, Dept Med, London, England
关键词
coronary disease; inflammation; predictive value of tests; proteins;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwg135
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The authors sought to assess the repeatability of measurements of C-reactive protein, an independent predictor of coronary heart disease, in a large cohort of apparently healthy men and to correct earlier estimates of the association of C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease for the measurement error in this protein. They measured C-reactive protein by a high-sensitivity assay in 936 men aged 45-64 years in the MONICA (Monitoring of Trends and Determinants in Cardiovascular Disease) Augsburg cohort in 1984-1985 and remeasured it 3 years later. All men were subjected to an 8-year follow-up of their cardiovascular status. The analytical variation of the assay was small, with the analytical variance component at 1 percent of the within-subject variance component, a repeatability coefficient of 25 percent, and a reliability coefficient of 1.00. In contrast, the within-subject variation of C-reactive protein corresponded to a repeatability coefficient of 740 percent and a reliability coefficient of 0.54, indicating considerable within-subject variation. Based on the authors' estimates, three serial determinations of C-reactive protein should be done to achieve a reliability of 0.75, the value they found for total cholesterol. Correcting the hazard ratios in their original analysis of the association of coronary heart disease and high-sensitivity-assay C-reactive protein for the measurement error in C-reactive protein and covariables leads to a considerably larger estimate. The results suggest that the true association between C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk is underestimated by a single C-reactive protein determination, and that several serial C-reactive protein measurements should be taken.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 364
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V41, P105, DOI DOI 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90084-4
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, CVD Prevention
[3]   A NOTE ON THE USE OF THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT IN THE EVALUATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN 2 METHODS OF MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 1990, 20 (05) :337-340
[4]   Measuring agreement in method comparison studies [J].
Bland, JM ;
Altman, DG .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) :135-160
[5]  
BOTHIG S, 1989, INT J EPIDEMIOL, V18, pS29
[6]  
CARROLL RJ, 1995, MEASUREMENT ERROR NO, P47
[7]   BIOLOGICAL VARIATION OF ACUTE-PHASE PROTEINS [J].
CLARK, GH ;
FRASER, CG .
ANNALS OF CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 1993, 30 :373-376
[8]  
Clarke R, 1999, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V150, P341
[9]  
COSTONGS GMPJ, 1985, J CLIN CHEM CLIN BIO, V23, P7
[10]   FIELLER THEOREM, THE LIKELIHOOD AND THE DELTA-METHOD [J].
COX, C .
BIOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (03) :709-718