MiraLAX vs. Golytely: is there a significant difference in the adenoma detection rate?

被引:22
作者
Enestvedt, B. K. [1 ]
Fennerty, M. Brian [1 ]
Zaman, A. [1 ]
Eisen, G. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Portland, OR 97239 USA
关键词
QUALITY INDICATORS; FELLOW INVOLVEMENT; BOWEL PREPARATION; COLONOSCOPY; OBESITY; CANCER; IMPACT; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04795.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Background In recent clinical trials (RCT) of bowel preparation, Golytely was more efficacious than MiraLAX. We hypothesised that there is a difference in adenoma detection between Golytely and MiraLAX. Aims To compare the adenoma detection rate (ADR) between these bowel preparations, and to identify independent predictors of bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection. Methods This was a post hoc analysis of an RCT that assessed efficacy and patient tolerability of Golytely vs. MiraLAX/Gatorade in average risk screening colonoscopy patients. Bowel preparation quality was measured with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). An excellent/good equivalent BBPS score was defined as >= 7. Polyp pathology review was performed. ADR was defined as the proportion of colonoscopies with an adenoma. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results One hundred and ninety patients were prospectively enrolled (87 MiraLAX, 103 Golytely). Golytely had a higher rate of a BBPS score >= 7 (82.5% vs. MiraLAX 67.8%, P = 0.02). The ADR in the Golytely cohort was 26.2% (27/103), and was 16.1% (14/87) for MiraLAX (P = 0.091). On multivariate analyses, Golytely was 2.13x more likely to be associated with a BBPS >= 7 (95% CI 1.05-4.32, P = 0.04) and 2.28x more likely to be associated with adenoma detection (95% CI 1.05-4.98, P = 0.04) than MiraLAX. Conclusions Golytely was more efficacious than MiraLAX in bowel cleansing, and was independently associated with both bowel prep quality (BBPS >= 7) and higher adenoma detection. Golytely should be used as first line for bowel prep for colonoscopy. Studies with larger populations are needed to confirm these results. (NCT00889655).
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 782
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy [J].
Barclay, Robert L. ;
Vicari, Joseph J. ;
Doughty, Andrea S. ;
Johanson, John F. ;
Greenlaw, Roger L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (24) :2533-2541
[2]
Adenoma detection and retroscopy [J].
Barthel, James S. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (03) :557-559
[3]
Variation in Colonoscopic Technique and Adenoma Detection Rates at an Academic Gastroenterology Unit [J].
Benson, Mark E. ;
Reichelderfer, Mark ;
Said, Adnan ;
Gaumnitz, Eric A. ;
Pfau, Patrick R. .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2010, 55 (01) :166-171
[4]
Impact of Obesity on Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy [J].
Borg, Brian B. ;
Gupta, Nitin K. ;
Zuckerman, Gary R. ;
Banerjee, Bhaskar ;
Gyawali, C. Prakash .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 7 (06) :670-675
[5]
Colonic Complications of Obesity [J].
Burke, Carol A. .
GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 39 (01) :47-+
[6]
Overweight, obesity, and mortality from cancer in a prospectively studied cohort of US adults [J].
Calle, EE ;
Rodriguez, C ;
Walker-Thurmond, K ;
Thun, MJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 348 (17) :1625-1638
[7]
Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection [J].
Chen, Shawn C. ;
Rex, Douglas K. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 42 (06) :704-707
[8]
Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy [J].
Chen, Shawn C. ;
Rex, Douglas K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 (04) :856-861
[9]
Dynamic patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal increase adenoma detection: a randomized, crossover trial [J].
East, James E. ;
Bassett, Paul ;
Arebi, Naila ;
Thomas-Gibson, Siwan ;
Guenther, Thomas ;
Saunders, Brian P. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2011, 73 (03) :456-463
[10]
Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely - a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy [J].
Enestvedt, B. K. ;
Fennerty, M. B. ;
Eisen, G. M. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 33 (01) :33-40