Priority of Candidates With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplantation Can Be Reduced After Successful Bridge Therapy

被引:92
作者
Cucchetti, Alessandro [1 ]
Cescon, Matteo [1 ]
Bigonzi, Eleonora [1 ]
Piscaglia, Fabio [2 ]
Golfieri, Rita [3 ]
Ercolani, Giorgio [1 ]
Morelli, Maria Cristina [1 ]
Ravaioli, Matteo [1 ]
Pinna, Antonio Daniele [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, St Orsola Malpighi Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Liver & Multiorgan Transplant Unit, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, St Orsola Malpighi Hosp, Dept Internal Med & Gastroenterol, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, St Orsola Malpighi Hosp, Radiol Unit, I-40138 Bologna, Italy
关键词
RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; COMPETING RISKS; UNITED-STATES; WAITING-LIST; SOLID TUMORS; SURVIVAL; CRITERIA; CHEMOEMBOLIZATION; MANAGEMENT; CIRRHOSIS;
D O I
10.1002/lt.22397
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
The allocation rules for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are awaiting liver transplantation (LT) are a difficult issue and are continually evolving. To reduce tumor progression or down-stage advanced disease, most transplant centers have adopted the practice of treating HCC candidates with resection or locoregional therapies. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of bridge therapy in preventing removal from the waiting list for death/sickness severity or tumor progression beyond the Milan criteria and in determining posttransplant outcomes. The removal rates for 315 adult patients with HCC who were listed for LT were analyzed and were correlated to responses to bridge therapy with a competing risk analysis. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month dropout rates were 3.5%, 6.5%, and 19.9%, respectively, and they were significantly affected by the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (P = 0.032), the tumor stage at diagnosis (P = 0.041), and the response to bridge therapy (P < 0.001). The stratification of candidates by the tumor stage and the response to bridge therapy showed that patients with T2 tumors who achieved only a partial response or no response to bridge therapy had the highest dropout rates, and they were followed by patients with successfully down-staged T3-T4a tumors (P = 0.037). Patients with T2 tumors who had a complete response and patients with T1 tumors had similar dropout rates (P = 0.964). The response to bridge therapy significantly affected both the recurrence rate of 176 transplant patients (P = 0.017) and the overall intention-to-treat survival rate (P = 0.001). In conclusion, the response to therapy is a potentially effective tool for prioritizing HCC patients for LT as well as select cases with different risks of tumor recurrence after transplantation. Liver Transpl 17:1344-1354, 2011. (C) 2011 AASLD.
引用
收藏
页码:1344 / 1354
页数:11
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
Liver Match, a prospective observational cohort study on liver transplantation in Italy: Study design and current practice of donor-recipient matching [J].
Angelico, Mario ;
Cillo, Umberto ;
Fagiuoli, Stefano ;
Gasbarrini, Antonio ;
Gavrila, Caius ;
Marianelli, Tania ;
Costa, Alessandro Nanni ;
Nardi, Alessandra ;
Strazzabosco, Mario ;
Burra, Patrizia ;
Agnes, Salvatore ;
Baccarani, Umberto ;
Calise, Fulvio ;
Colledan, Michele ;
Cuomo, Oreste ;
De Carlis, Luciano ;
Donataccio, Matteo ;
Ettorre, Giuseppe M. ;
Gerunda, Giorgio E. ;
Gridelli, Bruno ;
Lupo, Luigi ;
Mazzaferro, Vincenzo ;
Pinna, Antonio ;
Risaliti, Andrea ;
Salizzoni, Mauro ;
Tisone, Giuseppe ;
Valente, Umberto ;
Rossi, Giorgio ;
Rossi, Massimo ;
Zamboni, Fausto .
DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2011, 43 (02) :155-164
[2]
Management of hepatoceullular carcinoma [J].
Bruix, J ;
Sherman, M .
HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (05) :1208-1236
[3]
Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma.: Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL Conference [J].
Bruix, J ;
Sherman, M ;
Llovet, JM ;
Beaugrand, M ;
Lencioni, R ;
Burroughs, AK ;
Christensen, E ;
Pagliaro, L ;
Colombo, M ;
Rodés, J .
JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 35 (03) :421-430
[4]
Harm and Benefits of Primary Liver Resection and Salvage Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J].
Cucchetti, A. ;
Vitale, A. ;
Del Gaudio, M. ;
Ravaioli, M. ;
Ercolani, G. ;
Cescon, M. ;
Zanello, M. ;
Morelli, M. C. ;
Cillo, U. ;
Grazi, G. L. ;
Pinna, A. D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 10 (03) :619-627
[5]
Prediction of Progression-Free Survival in Patients Presenting with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Within the Milan Criteria [J].
De Giorgio, Massimo ;
Vezzoli, Stefano ;
Cohen, Eric ;
Armellini, Elia ;
Luca, Maria Grazia ;
Verga, Giulianna ;
Pinelli, Domenico ;
Nani, Roberto ;
Valsecchi, Maria Grazia ;
Antolini, Laura ;
Colledan, Michele ;
Fagiuoli, Stefano ;
Strazzabosco, Mario .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 16 (04) :503-512
[6]
Liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis after liver resection: University of bologna experience [J].
Del Gaudio, M. ;
Ercolani, G. ;
Ravaioli, M. ;
Cescon, M. ;
Lauro, A. ;
Vivarelli, M. ;
Zanello, M. ;
Cucchetti, A. ;
Vetrone, G. ;
Tuci, F. ;
Ramacciato, G. ;
Grazi, G. L. ;
Pinna, A. D. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 8 (06) :1177-1185
[7]
EDMONDSON HA, 1954, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V7, P462, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::AID-CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO
[8]
2-E
[9]
The continuing increase in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States: An update [J].
El-Serag, H ;
Davila, JA ;
Petersen, NJ ;
McGlynn, KA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2003, 139 (10) :817-823
[10]
Evaluation of Tumor Response After Locoregional Therapies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Are Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Reliable? [J].
Forner, Alejandro ;
Ayuso, Carmen ;
Varela, Maria ;
Rimola, Jordi ;
Hessheimer, Amelia J. ;
Rodriguez de Lope, Carlos ;
Reig, Maria ;
Bianchi, Luis ;
Llovet, Josep M. ;
Bruix, Jordi .
CANCER, 2009, 115 (03) :616-623