Patch testing with components of water-based metalworking fluids

被引:19
作者
Geier, J
Lessmann, H
Frosch, PJ
Pirker, C
Koch, P
Aschoff, R
Richter, G
Becker, D
Eckert, C
Uter, W
Schnuch, A
Fuchs, T
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Informat Verbund Dermatol Kliniken, D-3400 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Klinikum Dortmund, Dept Dermatol, Dortmund, Germany
[3] Univ Witten Herdecke, Dortmund, Germany
[4] Univ Saarland, Dept Dermatol, D-6650 Homburg, Germany
[5] Univ Dresden, Dept Dermatol, Dresden, Germany
[6] Univ Mainz, Dept Dermatol, D-6500 Mainz, Germany
[7] Castrol Ind GmbH, Monchengladbach, Germany
[8] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Med Informat Biometry & Epidemiol, Erlangen, Germany
[9] Univ Gottingen, Dept Dermatol, D-3400 Gottingen, Germany
关键词
2-(2-aminoethoxy) ethanol (diglycolamine); 2-amino-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol; contact allergy; iodopropynyl butylcarbamate; metalworking fluids; methyldiethanolamine; occupational; patch testing;
D O I
10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.00187.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Water-based metalworking fluids (MWFs) may cause both irritant and allergic contact dermatitis. Several well-known MWF allergens are available for patch testing, but considering the wide variety of possible components used in MWF, our diagnostic arsenal covers only a small part of potential allergens. We therefore selected 13 frequently used MWF components that might be sensitizers and had not yet been tested routinely. In 5 centres, 233 dermatitis patients with present or past occupational exposure to MWF were patch tested with this and other panels. Only 7 patients showed positive reactions to the study panel. Allergic reactions to the emulsifier diglycolamine [syn. 2-(2-aminoethoxy) ethanol] were seen in 5 patients, and 1 patient each reacted positively to 2-amino-2-ethyl-1,3-propanediol (AEPD) and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA). Clinical relevance of the reactions to diglycolamine was unequivocally proven by its presence in the MWF from the patients' workplace in 3 cases. Diglycolamine seems to be an important MWF allergen, independently from monoethanolamine and diethanolamine. A test concentration of 1% petrolatum (pet.) appears to be appropriate. The importance of AEPD and MDEA as MWF allergens still remains to be established. The lack of positive test reactions to the other MWF components tested may be due to their low-sensitizing potential or too low a patch test concentration being used.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 90
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Hand eczema in metalworker trainees - an analysis of risk factors [J].
Berndt, U ;
Hinnen, U ;
Iliev, D ;
Elsner, P .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2000, 43 (06) :327-332
[2]  
de Groot A., 1994, PATCH TESTING TEST C
[3]   DERMATOSES IN METAL WORKERS .2. ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS [J].
DEBOER, EM ;
VANKETEL, WG ;
BRUYNZEEL, DP .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1989, 20 (04) :280-286
[4]   DERMATOSES IN METAL WORKERS .1. IRRITANT CONTACT-DERMATITIS [J].
DEBOER, EM ;
VANKETEL, WG ;
BRUYNZEEL, DP .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1989, 20 (03) :212-218
[5]   Contact allergy to diglycolamine in a water-based metalworking fluid [J].
Geier, J ;
Lessmann, H ;
Graefe, A ;
Fuchs, T .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2002, 46 (02) :121-121
[6]  
GEIER J, 2002, FORSCHUNGSVORHABEN F
[7]  
Geier J., 2000, DERMATOL BERUF UMWEL, V48, P232
[8]  
Geier J, 2003, AKTUEL DERMATOL, V29, P185
[9]   CUTTING FLUID DERMATITIS [J].
GRATTAN, CEH ;
ENGLISH, JSC ;
FOULDS, IS ;
RYCROFT, RJG .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1989, 20 (05) :372-376
[10]  
GREIM H, 2000, GESUNDHEITSSCHADLICH, V31