Comparisons of EOS MLS cloud ice measurements with ECMWF analyses and GCM simulations: Initial results

被引:57
作者
Li, JL
Waliser, DE
Jiang, JH
Wu, DL
Read, W
Waters, JW
Tompkins, AM
Donner, LJ
Chern, JD
Tao, WK
Atlas, R
Gu, Y
Liou, KN
Del Genio, A
Khairoutdinov, M
Gettelman, A
机构
[1] SkillStorm Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[2] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[3] European Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading RG6 6AL, Berks, England
[4] Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ 08542 USA
[5] NASA, Goddard Earth Sci & Technol Ctr, GSFC, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[6] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[8] NASA, Goddard Inst Space Studies, New York, NY 10025 USA
[9] Colorado State Univ, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[10] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2005GL023788
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
To assess the status of global climate models (GCMs) in simulating upper-tropospheric ice water content (IWC), a new set of IWC measurements from the Earth Observing System's Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) are used. Comparisons are made with ECMWF analyses and simulations from several GCMs, including two with multi-scale-modeling framework. For January 2005 monthly and daily mean values, the spatial agreement between MLS and ECMWF is quite good, although MLS estimates are higher by a factor of 2 - 3 over the Western Pacific, tropical Africa and South America. For the GCMs, the model-data agreement is within a factor of 2 - 4 with larger values of disagreement occurring over Eastern Pacific and Atlantic ITCZs, tropical Africa and South America. The implications arising from sampling and uncertainties in the observations, the modeled values and their comparison are discussed. These initial results demonstrate the potential usefulness of this data set for evaluating GCM performance and guiding development efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 5
页数:5
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Cumulus microphysics and climate sensitivity [J].
Del Genio, AD ;
Kovari, W ;
Yao, MS ;
Jonas, J .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2005, 18 (13) :2376-2387
[2]  
Donner LJ, 2001, J CLIMATE, V14, P3444, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014<3444:ACPIMF>2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Gu Y, 2003, J CLIMATE, V16, P3357, DOI 10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<3357:POCPIT>2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   An improved strategy for the evaluation of cloud parameterizations in GCMS [J].
Jakob, C .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2003, 84 (10) :1387-+
[7]   A cloud resolving model as a cloud parameterization in the NCAR Community Climate System Model: Preliminary results [J].
Khairoutdinov, MF ;
Randall, DA .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (18) :3617-3620
[8]  
Lin X, 2000, J CLIMATE, V13, P4159, DOI [10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<4159:DVOTHC>2.0.CO
[9]  
2, 10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013&lt
[10]  
4159:DVOTHC&gt