The influence of prey abundance on the feeding ecology of two piscivorous species of coral reef fish

被引:88
作者
Beukers-Stewart, BD [1 ]
Jones, GP [1 ]
机构
[1] James Cook Univ N Queensland, Dept Marine Biol, Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
coral reef fishes; diet; predation; prey selection; feeding rates; predator impacts;
D O I
10.1016/j.jembe.2003.08.015
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Despite the potential importance of predation as a process structuring coral reef fish communities, few studies have examined how the diet of piscivorous fish responds to fluctuations in the abundance of their prey. This study focused on two species of rock-cod, Cephalopholis cyanostigma (Valenciennes, 1828) and Cephalopholis boenak (Bloch, 1790) (Serranidae), and monitored their diet in two different habitats (patch and contiguous reef) at Lizard Island on the nor-them Great Barrier Reef, Australia, over a 2-year period. The abundance of the rock-cods and the abundance and family composition of their prey were monitored at the same time. Dietary information was largely collected from regurgitated samples, which represented approximately 60% of the prey consumed and were unbiased in composition. A laboratory experiment showed that fish were digested approximately four times faster than crustaceans, leading to gross overestimation of the importance of crustaceans in the diet. When this was taken into account fish were found to make up over 90% of the diet of both species. Prey fish of the family Apogonidae, followed by Pomacentridae and Clupeidae, dominated the diet of both species of rock-cod. The interacting effect of fluctuations in prey abundance and patterns of prey selection caused dietary composition to vary both temporally and spatially. Mid-water schooling prey belonging to the families Clupeidae and to a lesser extent Caesionidae were selected for over other families. In the absence of these types of prey, apogonids were selected for over the more reef-associated pomacentrids. A laboratory experiment supported the hypothesis that such patterns were mainly due to prey behaviour. Feeding rates of both species of rock-cod were much higher in summer than in winter, and in summer they concentrated on small recruit sized fish. However, there was little variation in feeding rates between habitats, despite apparent differences in prey abundance. In summary, our observations of how the feeding ecology of predatory fish responded to variation in prey abundance provide potential mechanisms for how predation may affect the community structure of coral reef fishes. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 184
页数:30
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Andreasson S., 1971, Report Institute of Freshwater Research Drottningholm, VNo. 51, P5
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1967, INT C TROPICAL OCEAN
[3]   Effects of a predatory fish on the recruitment and abundance of Caribbean coral reef fishes [J].
Beets, J .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1997, 148 (1-3) :11-21
[4]  
Begon M, 1986, Ecology
[5]   Habitat complexity modifies the impact of piscivores on a coral reef fish population [J].
Beukers, JS ;
Jones, GP .
OECOLOGIA, 1998, 114 (01) :50-59
[6]   DIETS OF LAGOON FISHES OF THE SOLOMON-ISLANDS - PREDATORS OF TUNA BAITFISH AND TROPHIC EFFECTS OF BAITFISHING ON THE SUBSISTENCE FISHERY [J].
BLABER, SJM ;
MILTON, DA ;
RAWLINSON, NJF ;
TIROBA, G ;
NICHOLS, PV .
FISHERIES RESEARCH, 1990, 8 (03) :263-286
[7]   Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations [J].
Caley, MJ ;
Carr, MH ;
Hixon, MA ;
Hughes, TP ;
Jones, GP ;
Menge, BA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1996, 27 :477-500
[8]   PREDATION, RECRUITMENT AND THE DYNAMICS OF COMMUNITIES OF CORAL-REEF FISHES [J].
CALEY, MJ .
MARINE BIOLOGY, 1993, 117 (01) :33-43
[9]   Refuge availability structures assemblages of tropical reef fishes [J].
Caley, MJ ;
StJohn, J .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 1996, 65 (04) :414-428
[10]   PREDATION EFFECTS ON EARLY POSTSETTLEMENT SURVIVORSHIP OF CORAL-REEF FISHES [J].
CARR, MH ;
HIXON, MA .
MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 1995, 124 (1-3) :31-42