Creative product analysis matrix: Testing the model structure and a comparison among products - Three novel chairs

被引:123
作者
Besemer, SP [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Fredonia, Fredonia, NY 14063 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15326934crj1104_7
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
This article describes the empirical use of the Creative Product Semantic Scale (CPSS) to evaluate 3 creative products by 128 student participants in 2 "folk high schools" in western Norway. First, the factor structure of the model was examined and tested through exploratory principle components factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Then, multivariate analysis of variance was used to confirm that the CPSS could detect differences perceived in the levels of the factors Novelty, Resolution, and Elaboration and Synthesis in the 3 products. In CFA, as hypothesized, a solution with 3 factors provided a better fit to the data for each of the 3 creative products than an alternative 2-factor solution. The results of this study established the usefulness of the CPSS to detect differences perceived by the participants among the 3 chairs along all 3 dimensions.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 346
页数:14
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ABRAMS HN, 1988, 397 CHAIRS
[3]  
[Anonymous], NURTURING DEV CREATI
[4]  
ARANG M, 1998, HIST CULTURE FOLK HI
[5]   Measuring divergent thinking attitudes related to creative problem solving and innovation management [J].
Basadur, M ;
Hausdorf, PA .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1996, 9 (01) :21-32
[6]  
BENTLER PM, 1995, EQS WINDOWS VERSION
[7]   ANALYZING CREATIVE PRODUCTS - REFINEMENT AND TEST OF A JUDGING INSTRUMENT [J].
BESEMER, S ;
OQUIN, K .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 1986, 20 (02) :115-126
[8]  
Besemer S.P., 1987, Frontiers of Creativity Research: Beyond the Basic, P341
[9]   ANALYSIS OF CREATIVE PRODUCTS - REVIEW AND SYNTHESIS [J].
BESEMER, SP ;
TREFFINGER, DJ .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 1981, 15 (03) :158-178
[10]   CREATIVE PRODUCT AND CREATIVE PROCESS IN SCIENCE AND ART [J].
BRISKMAN, L .
INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1980, 23 (01) :83-106