Expanding the Scope of Conflict: Interest Groups and Interstate Compacts

被引:7
作者
Bowman, Ann O' M. [1 ]
Woods, Neal D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Bush Sch Govt & Publ Serv, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Univ S Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
INTEREST REPRESENTATION; POLICY; STATES; CENTRALIZATION; GOVERNMENT; INNOVATION; GRIDLOCK; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00713.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Objective. This study looks at how the characteristics of states' interest group environments affect state participation in interstate compacts. Drawing on prominent theories of interest system characteristics, we hypothesize that interest group density and concentration will influence a state's propensity to join compacts. Method. Using pooled cross-sectional time-series event-count models, we test our hypotheses for 48 states over a 30-year period. Results. We find that states with denser interest group systems are more likely to join interstate compacts, but that greater concentration of organized interests in a few economic sectors impedes compact formation. Additional analyses show that the effects of state interest group systems vary across types of interest groups and compacts. In particular, the effects of interest group density appear to be driven primarily by not-for-profit groups generating increased state participation in noneconomic compacts. Conclusion. Interstate cooperation is influenced in important ways by characteristics of interest group environments.
引用
收藏
页码:669 / 688
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
BELL MT, 2004, SPECTRUM-J STATE GOV, V77, P12
[2]   TAX INNOVATION IN THE STATES - CAPITALIZING ON POLITICAL OPPORTUNITY [J].
BERRY, FS ;
BERRY, WD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1992, 36 (03) :715-742
[3]   Reassessing the "Race to the bottom" in state welfare policy [J].
Berry, WD ;
Fording, RC ;
Hanson, RL .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2003, 65 (02) :327-349
[4]  
BEYLE T, 1999, POLITICS AM STATES C
[5]   Divided government, interest representation, and policy differences: Competing explanations of gridlock in the fifty states [J].
Bowling, CJ ;
Ferguson, MR .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2001, 63 (01) :182-206
[6]   Strength in numbers: Why states join interstate compacts [J].
Bowman, Ann O'M ;
Woods, Neal D. .
STATE POLITICS & POLICY QUARTERLY, 2007, 7 (04) :347-368
[7]   Power shift - Measuring policy centralization in US intergovernmental relations, 1947-1998 [J].
Bowman, AOM ;
Krause, GA .
AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2003, 31 (03) :301-325
[8]  
Broun, 2006, EVOLVING USE CHANGIN
[9]  
De Figueiredo RJP, 2004, J LAW ECON, V47, P569
[10]  
Dye T.R., 1966, POLITICS EC PUBLIC