Efficacy, safety and cycle control of five oral contraceptive regimens containing norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol

被引:11
作者
LaGuardia, KD
Shangold, G
Fisher, A
Friedman, A
Kafrissen, M
机构
[1] Ortho McNeil Pharmaceut Inc, Womens Hlth Care, Raritan, NJ 08869 USA
[2] Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceut Res & Dev, Raritan, NJ USA
关键词
Ortho Tri-Cyclen (R) Lo; Ortho Tri-Cyclen (R); norgestimate; ethinyl estradiol; ovulation; suppression; cycle control;
D O I
10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00069-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
This randomized, multicenter, parallel group study evaluated four new, oral contraceptive regimens of norgestimate (NGM) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) relative to ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN(R) (NGM 180/215/250 mug/EE 35 mug). Healthy women (50/group) received three cycles of either ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN(R) Lo (NGM 180/215/250 mug/EE 25 mug), one of three cyclophasic regimens (NGM cycling 180-250 mug/EE 35 mug or 25 mug) or ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN. Among all five regimens, ovulation suppression, cycle control and safety were generally comparable. Presumed ovulation (serum progesterone levels greater than or equal to3 ng/mL during Days 19-21 of Cycle 3), occurred in 0/41(0%) subjects on ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN Lo and 3/43 (7%) subjects on ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN. Breakthrough bleeding and/or spotting (BBS; % total cycles) was 17.2% for ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN Lo and 14.4% for ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN. The mean number of days of BBS/cycle for ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN Lo and ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN was 3.7 and 3.1, respectively, for those subjects with such bleeding. Thus, ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN Lo appears similar to ORTHO TRI-CYCLEN in inhibiting ovulation and providing cycle control. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 437
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   COMPARATIVE PROFILES OF RELIABILITY, CYCLE CONTROL AND SIDE-EFFECTS OF 2 OR AL CONTRACEPTIVE FORMULATIONS CONTAINING 150 MU-G DESOGESTREL AND EITHER 30 MU-G OR 20 MU-G ETHINYL ESTRADIOL [J].
AKERLUND, M ;
RODE, A ;
WESTERGAARD, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1993, 100 (09) :832-838
[2]   Evaluation of contraceptive efficacy and cycle control of a transdermal contraceptive patch vs an oral contraceptive - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Audet, MC ;
Moreau, M ;
Koltun, WD ;
Waldbaum, AS ;
Shangold, G ;
Fisher, AC ;
Creasy, GW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (18) :2347-2354
[3]  
CHAPDELAINE A, 1989, INT J FERTIL, V34, P347
[4]  
CORSON SL, 1994, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V170, P1556
[5]  
Corson SL, 1990, ACTA OBSTET GYN SCAN, V69, P25
[6]  
EYONG E, 1988, FERTIL STERIL, V50, P756
[7]  
HULL M E, 1986, Advances in Contraception, V2, P71, DOI 10.1007/BF01849299
[8]   Single luteal phase serum progesterone assay as an indicator of ovulation (Reprinted from Am J Obstet Gynecol vol 112, pg 1043, 1972) [J].
Israel, R ;
Mishell, DR ;
Stone, SC ;
Thorneycroft, IH ;
Moyer, DL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 176 (02) :490-490
[9]   Oral contraceptive estrogen dose considerations [J].
Kaunitz, AM .
CONTRACEPTION, 1998, 58 (03) :15S-21S
[10]   COMPARATIVE CONTRACEPTIVE EFFICACY AND MECHANISM OF ACTION OF THE NORGESTIMATE-CONTAINING TRIPHASIC ORAL-CONTRACEPTIVE [J].
LONDON, RS ;
CHAPDELAINE, A ;
UPMALIS, D ;
OLSON, W ;
SMITH, J .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 71 :9-14