Two algorithms to estimate fractal dimension of gray-level images

被引:74
作者
Chen, WS [1 ]
Yuan, SY
Hsieh, CM
机构
[1] Natl Chi Nan Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Visual Informat Proc & CyberCommun Lab, Nant Tou, Taiwan
[2] Feng Chia Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Taichung 40724, Taiwan
[3] Hsiuping Inst Technol, Dept Informat Management, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词
digital textured image; fractal theory; Hausdorff dimension; fractal dimension; box-counting method;
D O I
10.1117/1.1585061
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The fractal dimension is a fascinating feature highly correlated with the human perception of surface roughness, and has been successfully applied to texture analysis, segmentation, and classification. Several approaches have been developed to estimate the fractal dimension. Among them, the box-counting (BC) method is nonstochastic and popular in estimating the fractal dimension of a two-tone image. The differential box-counting (DBC) method, a generalization of the classical BC method, was proposed to compute the fractal dimension for a 2-D gray-level image. However, the classical BC and the DBC methods have several major drawbacks, such as overcounting and undercounting the number of boxes. Hence, the real value of the fractal dimension cannot be reached. In this work, two algorithms that can obtain more accurate estimates of the fractal dimension are proposed. The first one, a modified algorithm of the DBC method, is called the shifting DBC (SDBC) algorithm, and the second one is called the scanning BC (SBC) algorithm. We theoretically prove that the SDBC algorithm approaches the estimated value closer to the exact fractal dimension than the DBC method. Simulation results show that the two proposed algorithms can resolve the drawbacks that the BC and the DBC methods possess. Compared to the DBC method, the two proposed algorithms consistently give more satisfactory results on synthetic and natural textured images. (C) 2003 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:2452 / 2464
页数:13
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, FRACTAL IMAGING
[2]   A power differentiation method of fractal dimension estimation for 2-D signals [J].
Asvestas, P ;
Matsopoulos, GK ;
Nikita, KS .
JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION AND IMAGE REPRESENTATION, 1998, 9 (04) :392-400
[3]  
BARMSLEY MF, 1993, FRACTAL EVERYWHERE
[4]  
BARNSLEY MF, 1988, BYTE, V13, P215
[5]  
Brodatz P., 1966, TEXTURE PHOTOGRAPHIC
[6]   TEXTURE SEGMENTATION USING FRACTAL DIMENSION [J].
CHAUDHURI, BB ;
SARKAR, N .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 17 (01) :72-77
[7]   FRACTAL FEATURE ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION IN MEDICAL IMAGING [J].
CHEN, CC ;
DAPONTE, JS ;
FOX, MD .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1989, 8 (02) :133-142
[8]   SHAPE FROM FRACTAL GEOMETRY [J].
CHEN, SS ;
KELLER, JM ;
CROWNOVER, RM .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1990, 43 (02) :199-218
[9]   ON THE CALCULATION OF FRACTAL FEATURES FROM IMAGES [J].
CHEN, SS ;
KELLER, JM ;
CROWNOVER, RM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1993, 15 (10) :1087-1090
[10]   FRACTAL DIMENSION IN THE ANALYSIS OF MEDICAL IMAGES [J].
FORTIN, C ;
KUMARESAN, R ;
OHLEY, W ;
HOEFER, S .
IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 1992, 11 (02) :65-71