One-footed and externally disturbed two-footed postural control in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy control subjects - A controlled study with follow-up

被引:115
作者
Luoto, S
Aalto, H
Taimela, S
Hurri, H
Pyykko, I
Alaranta, H
机构
[1] Invalid Fdn, ORTON Rehabil Ctr, FIN-00280 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Helsinki, Finland
[3] David Back Clin Int, Vantaa, Finland
[4] Karolinska Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, S-10401 Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Kapyla Rehabil Ctr, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
functional restoration; low back pain; postural control; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199810010-00008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A study of postural control during one-footed and externally disturbed two-footed stance among healthy control subjects and patients with chronic low back pain at the beginning of a functional back restoration program and 6 months later at follow-up examination. Objectives. To study postural control cross-sectionally among control subjects and patients with low back pain, and to evaluate the effects of functional restoration on the postural control parameters in a follow-up examination. Summary of Background Data. Deficits of motor skills and coordination have been reported in association with musculoskeletal disorders. It has been found that patients with chronic low back pain have impaired psychomotor control, but the impairment is reversible with successful low back rehabilitation. It is insufficiently known how functional activation and intensive physical training affect postural control. Methods. Sixty-one healthy volunteers (32 men, 29 women) and altogether 99 patients with low back pain participated in the study. Sixty-eight patients (33 men, 35 women) had moderate and 31 (18 men, 13 women) had severe low back pain. Postural stability was measured with a force platform. In two-footed stance, vibration stimulation on calf and back muscles was used to disturb the balance. Center point of force-velocity (cmi sec), average position shift in anteroposterior direction (cm), and maximal position shift in lateral direction (cm) were used as the parameters. Results. Reliability of all tests was acceptable, Center point of force-velocity was the most sensitive parameter and the one-footed measurement the most sensitivetest for evaluating postural stability. At the beginning, the patients with severe low back pain had poorer one-footed postural control compared with the control subjects (P = 0.0003). The subgroup of patients with moderate low back pain participated in the restoration program. The outcome of the restoration program was considered good if the disability because of low back pain (Oswestry index) decreased during the restoration program and poor if the disability increased or did not change. The one-footed postural stability remained primarily at the same level as the initial results in the control and good outcome groups, but became significantly poorer in the poor outcome group. The difference between poor outcome and control groups was statistically significant (P = 0.04). Conclusions. impaired postural stability seems to be one factor in multidimensional symptomatology of patients with chronic low back trouble. Postural stability is easily disturbed in case of impairment in strength, coordination, or effective coupling of muscles in the lumbar and pelvic area. Patients with chronic low back pain seem to experience impairment in these functions, which should be taken into consideration when back rehabilitation programs are planned.
引用
收藏
页码:2081 / 2089
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] ALARANTA A, 1994, CRIT REV PHYS REHAB, V6, P337
  • [2] INTENSIVE PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL TRAINING-PROGRAM FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN - A CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL
    ALARANTA, H
    RYTOKOSKI, U
    RISSANEN, A
    TALO, S
    RONNEMAA, T
    PUUKKA, P
    KARPPI, SL
    VIDEMAN, T
    KALLIO, V
    SLATIS, P
    [J]. SPINE, 1994, 19 (12) : 1339 - 1349
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1988, Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis
  • [4] BECK JR, 1986, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V110, P13
  • [5] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [6] REFERENCE VALUES FOR NORMAL REGIONAL LUMBAR SAGITTAL MOBILITY
    BURTON, AK
    TILLOTSON, KM
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1988, 3 (02) : 106 - 113
  • [7] VARIATIONS IN BALANCE AND BODY SWAY IN MIDDLE-AGED ADULTS - SUBJECTS WITH HEALTHY BACKS COMPARED WITH SUBJECTS WITH LOW-BACK DYSFUNCTION
    BYL, NN
    SINNOTT, PL
    [J]. SPINE, 1991, 16 (03) : 325 - 330
  • [8] Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
  • [9] FORM AND FUNCTION OF THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM AS REVEALED BY MATHEMATICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE - AN ESSAY
    FARFAN, HF
    [J]. SPINE, 1995, 20 (13) : 1462 - 1474
  • [10] FORSSTROM J, 1992, MACHINE LEARNING CLI