An integrated approach to the quantification of aortic regurgitation by Doppler echocardiography

被引:18
作者
Zarauza, J [1 ]
Ares, M [1 ]
Vílchez, FG [1 ]
Hernando, JP [1 ]
Gutiérrez, B [1 ]
Figueroa, A [1 ]
de Prada, JAV [1 ]
Durán, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Marques de Valdecilla, Serv Cardiol & Hemodinam, Santander 39008, Cantabria, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-8703(98)70160-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Although different Doppler methods have been proposed for the quantification of aortic regurgitation, no study has prospectively compared these methods with each other and their correlation with angiography. The aim of this study was to prospectively analyze the usefulness of different Doppler echocardiography parameters by testing all such parameters in each patient. Methods Fifty-one patients with aortic regurgitation underwent 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic studies and catheterization. The following Doppler indexes were analyzed and compared with aortography. Color Doppler: (1) jet color height/left ventricular outflow tract height in parasternal long-axis view, and (2) let color area/left ventricular outflow tract area in short-axis view. Continuous Doppler: (3) regurgitant flow pressure half-time, (4) regurgitant flow time velocity integral (in centimeters), and (5) regurgitant flow time velocity integral (in centimeters)/diastolic period (in milliseconds). Pulsed Doppler in thoracic and abdominal aorta: (6) rime velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow (in centimeters), (7) time velocity integral of systolic anterograde flow/integral of diastolic reverse flow, (8) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100, and (9) diastolic reverse flow duration/diastolic period (as a percentage). We compared these parameters with severity of: regurgitation measured by angiography and classified as mild, moderate, or severe. Results The most useful parameters were (1) jet color height/left ventricular outflow tract height (correctly classified 42 of 49 patients), (2) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastolic period) x 100 in the thoracic aorta (correctly classified 41 of 46 patients), and (3) (time velocity integral of diastolic reverse flow/diastotic period) x 100 in the abdominal aorta (correctly classified 42 of 49 patients). Sequential integration of these 3 parameters correctly classified 96% of patients (44 of 46 patients) and was achieved in 90% of cases. Conclusion An integrated combination of several Doppler parameters can quickly and accurately classify the degree of aortic regurgitation as determined by angiography.
引用
收藏
页码:1030 / 1041
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
BAUMGARTNER H, 1991, AM J CARDIOL, V65, P78
[2]   COMPUTER-ANALYSIS OF DOPPLER COLOR FLOW MAPPING IMAGES FOR QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INVITRO FLUID JETS [J].
BOLGER, AF ;
EIGLER, NL ;
PFAFF, JM ;
RESSER, KJ ;
MAURER, G .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1988, 12 (02) :450-457
[3]   ASSESSMENT OF AORTIC-INSUFFICIENCY BY TRANSCUTANEOUS DOPPLER ULTRASOUND [J].
BOUGHNER, DR .
CIRCULATION, 1975, 52 (05) :874-879
[4]  
BRAUNWALD E, 1992, HEART DISEASE, P1043
[5]   A NEW METHOD FOR NONINVASIVE QUANTIFICATION OF VALVULAR REGURGITATION BASED ON CONSERVATION OF MOMENTUM - INVITRO VALIDATION [J].
CAPE, EG ;
SKOUFIS, EG ;
WEYMAN, AE ;
YOGANATHAN, AP ;
LEVINE, RA .
CIRCULATION, 1989, 79 (06) :1343-1353
[6]  
CRAFT CH, 1984, AM J CARDIOL, V53, P1593
[7]   QUANTITATION OF AORTIC REGURGITATION BY DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY - A PRACTICAL APPROACH [J].
DOLAN, MS ;
CASTELLO, R ;
STVRAIN, JA ;
AGUIRRE, F ;
LABOVITZ, AJ .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1995, 129 (05) :1014-1020
[8]   EFFECTIVE REGURGITANT ORIFICE AREA - A NONINVASIVE DOPPLER DEVELOPMENT OF AN OLD HEMODYNAMIC CONCEPT [J].
ENRIQUEZSARANO, M ;
SEWARD, JB ;
BAILEY, KR ;
TAJIK, AJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1994, 23 (02) :443-451
[9]  
FOSTER GP, 1996, CIRCULATION, V94, P1
[10]   QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT BY DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY OF PULMONARY OR AORTIC REGURGITATION [J].
GOLDBERG, SJ ;
ALLEN, HD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1985, 56 (01) :131-135