Source identification of Atlanta aerosol by positive matrix factorization

被引:333
作者
Kim, E
Hopke, PK
Edgerton, ES
机构
[1] Clarkson Univ, Dept Chem Engn, Potsdam, NY 13699 USA
[2] Atmospher Res & Anal Inc, Durham, NC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/10473289.2003.10466209
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Data characterizing daily integrated particulate matter (PM) samples collected at the Jefferson Street monitoring site in Atlanta, GA, were analyzed through the application of a bilinear positive matrix factorization (PMF) model. A total of 662 samples and 26 variables were used for fine particle (particles less than or equal to2.5 mum in aerodynamic diameter) samples(PM2.5), and 685 samples and 15 variables were used for coarse particle (particles between 2.5 and 10 mum in aerodynamic diameter) samples (PM10-2.5). Measured PM mass concentrations and compositional data were used as independent variables. To obtain the quantitative contributions for each source, the factors were normalized using PMF-apportioned mass concentrations. For fine particle data, eight sources were identified: SO42--rich secondary aerosol (56%), motor vehicle (22%), wood smoke (11%), NO3--rich secondary aerosol (7%), mixed source of cement kiln and organic carbon (OC) (2%), airborne soil (1%), metal recycling facility (0.5%), and mixed source of bus station and metal processing (0.3%). The SO42--rich and NO3--rich secondary aerosols were associated with NH4+. The SO42--rich secondary aerosols also included OC. For the coarse particle data, five sources contributed to the observed mass: airborne soil (60%), NO3-rich secondary aerosol (16%), SO42--rich secondary aerosol (12%), cement kiln (11%), and metal recycling facility (1%). Conditional probability functions were computed using surface wind data and identified mass contributions from each source. The results of this analysis agreed well with the locations of known local point sources.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 739
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 600A00048 EPA
[2]  
APPLE BR, 1983, ATMOS ENVIRON, V17, P1787
[3]   A RESIDENCE TIME PROBABILITY ANALYSIS OF SULFUR CONCENTRATIONS AT GRAND-CANYON-NATIONAL-PARK [J].
ASHBAUGH, LL ;
MALM, WC ;
SADEH, WZ .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1985, 19 (08) :1263-1270
[4]   Composition of light-duty motor vehicle exhaust particulate matter in the Denver, Colorado area [J].
Cadle, SH ;
Mulawa, PA ;
Hunsanger, EC ;
Nelson, K ;
Ragazzi, RA ;
Barrett, R ;
Gallagher, GL ;
Lawson, DR ;
Knapp, KT ;
Snow, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (14) :2328-2339
[5]   Investigation of sources of atmospheric aerosol at urban and suburban residential areas in Thailand by positive matrix factorization [J].
Chueinta, W ;
Hopke, PK ;
Paatero, P .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2000, 34 (20) :3319-3329
[6]   Inhaled concentrated ambient particles are associated with hematologic and bronchoalveolar lavage changes in canines [J].
Clarke, RW ;
Coull, B ;
Reinisch, U ;
Catalano, P ;
Killingsworth, CR ;
Koutrakis, P ;
Kavouras, I ;
Murthy, GGK ;
Lawrence, J ;
Lovett, E ;
Wolfson, JM ;
Verrier, RL ;
Godleski, JJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 108 (12) :1179-1187
[7]   AN ASSOCIATION BETWEEN AIR-POLLUTION AND MORTALITY IN 6 UNITED-STATES CITIES [J].
DOCKERY, DW ;
POPE, CA ;
XU, XP ;
SPENGLER, JD ;
WARE, JH ;
FAY, ME ;
FERRIS, BG ;
SPEIZER, FE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1993, 329 (24) :1753-1759
[8]   A COMPOSITE RECEPTOR METHOD APPLIED TO PHILADELPHIA AEROSOL [J].
DZUBAY, TG ;
STEVENS, RK ;
GORDON, GE ;
OLMEZ, I ;
SHEFFIELD, AE ;
COURTNEY, WJ .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1988, 22 (01) :46-52
[9]   CURRENT FACTOR-ANALYSIS RECEPTOR MODELS ARE ILL-POSED [J].
HENRY, RC .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1987, 21 (08) :1815-1820
[10]  
Hopke P.K., 1985, RECEPTOR MODELING EN