A Theory of States and Traits-Revised

被引:216
作者
Steyer, Rolf [1 ]
Mayer, Axel [2 ]
Geiser, Christian [3 ]
Cole, David A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jena, Dept Methodol & Evaluat Res, D-07743 Jena, Germany
[2] Univ Ghent, Dept Data Anal, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[3] Utah State Univ, Dept Psychol, Logan, UT 84322 USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychol & Human Dev, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
来源
ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 11 | 2015年 / 11卷
关键词
states; traits; latent variables; person concept; classical test theory; LATENT; MODEL; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153719
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We present a revision of latent state-trait (LST-R) theory with new definitions of states and traits. This theory applies whenever we study the consistency of behavior, its variability, and its change over time. States and traits are defined in terms of probability theory. This allows for a seamless transition from theory to statistical modeling of empirical data. LST-R theory not only gives insights into the nature of latent variables but it also takes into account four fundamental facts: Observations are fallible, they never happen in a situational vacuum, they are always made using a specific method of observations, and there is no person without a past. Although the first fact necessitates considering measurement error, the second fact requires allowances for situational fluctuations. The third fact implies that, in the first place, states and traits are method specific. Furthermore, compared to the previous version of LST theory (see, e.g., Steyer et al. 1992, 1999), our revision is based on the notion of a person-at-time-t. The new definitions in LST-R theory have far-reaching implications that not only concern the properties of states, traits, and the associated concepts of measurement errors and state residuals, but also are related to the analysis of states and traits in longitudinal observational and intervention studies.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / +
页数:74
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Anastasi A., 1983, Principles of modern psychological measurement, P345
[2]  
Bollen KA, 2006, WILEY SER PROBAB ST, P1
[3]   Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences [J].
Bollen, KA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 53 :605-634
[4]   Empirical and conceptual problems with longitudinal trait-state models: Introducing a trait-state-occasion model [J].
Cole, DA ;
Martin, NC ;
Steiger, JH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2005, 10 (01) :3-20
[5]   SITUATIONAL EFFECTS IN TRAIT ASSESSMENT - THE FPI, NEOFFI, AND EPI QUESTIONNAIRES [J].
DEINZER, R ;
STEYER, R ;
EID, M ;
NOTZ, P ;
SCHWENKMEZGER, P ;
OSTENDORF, F ;
NEUBAUER, A .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1995, 9 (01) :1-23
[6]  
Eid M, 1998, J EDUC BEHAV STAT, V23, P193, DOI 10.2307/1165244
[7]  
Eid M, 1999, EUR J PERSONALITY, V13, P283, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199907/08)13:4<283::AID-PER341>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-0
[9]   The measurement of consistency and occasion specificity with latent class models: A new model and its application to the measurement of affect [J].
Eid, M ;
Langeheine, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1999, 4 (01) :100-116
[10]  
Eid M., 1996, Methods of Psychological Research Online, V1, P65, DOI [10.3102/10769986023003193, DOI 10.3102/10769986023003193]