Robotic surgery: identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill

被引:115
作者
Chang, L [1 ]
Satava, RM [1 ]
Pellegrini, CA [1 ]
Sinanan, MN [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2003年 / 17卷 / 11期
关键词
ZEUS Surgical Robotic System; robotic surgery; learning curve; robotic skills; objective assessment; knot tying;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-003-8813-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The incorporation of new devices into surgical practice often requires that surgeons acquire and master new skills. We studied the learning curve for intracorporeal knot tying in robotic surgery. Methods: We developed an objective scoring system to evaluate knot tying and tested eight attending surgeons during 3 weeks of training on a surgical robot. Each performed intracorporeal knot tying tasks both before and after robotic skills training. These performances were compared to their laparoscopic knots and analyzed to determine and define skill improvement. Results: Baseline laparoscopic knot completion took 140 sec (range, 47-432), with a mean composite score of 77 (100 possible), whereas robotic knot tying took 390 sec, with a mean composite score of 40. After initial robotic training, times decreased by 65% to 139 sec and scores increased to 71. With more training, completion times and composite scores were improved and errors were reduced. Conclusion: Like any new technology, surgical robotics requires dedicated training to achieve mastery. Initially, even experienced laparoscopists may register an inferior performance. However, after adequate training, surgeons can exceed their laparoscopic performance, completing intracorporeal knots better and faster using robotics.
引用
收藏
页码:1744 / 1748
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: Challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery [J].
Ballantyne, GH .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2002, 12 (01) :1-5
[2]   Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills [J].
Derossis, AM ;
Fried, GM ;
Abrahamowicz, M ;
Sigman, HH ;
Barkun, JS ;
Meakins, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 175 (06) :482-487
[3]   An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy [J].
Eubanks, TR ;
Clements, RH ;
Pohl, D ;
Williams, N ;
Schaad, DC ;
Horgan, S ;
Pellegrini, C .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 189 (06) :566-574
[4]   Manual vs robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of basic manipulation and suturing tasks [J].
Garcia-Ruiz, A ;
Gagner, M ;
Miller, JH ;
Steiner, CP ;
Hahn, JF .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 133 (09) :957-961
[5]  
KOHN LT, 1999, TO ERR IS HUMAN BUIL
[6]   Minimally invasive and robotic surgery [J].
Mack, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (05) :568-572
[7]  
MEYERS WC, 1995, AM J SURG, V170, P55
[8]   Efficiency of manual vs robotical (Zeus) assisted laparoscopic surgery in the performance of standardized tasks [J].
Nio, D ;
Bemelman, WA ;
den Boer, KT ;
Dunker, MS ;
Gouma, DJ ;
van Gulik, TM .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (03) :412-415
[9]  
Rosser JC, 1997, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V132, P200
[10]   Defining a learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal resections [J].
Schlachta, CM ;
Mamazza, J ;
Seshadri, PA ;
Cadeddu, M ;
Gregoire, R ;
Poulin, EC .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2001, 44 (02) :217-222