A preoperative clinical prognostic model for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma

被引:116
作者
Cindolo, L
de la Taille, A
Messina, G
Romis, L
Abbou, CC
Altieri, V
Rodriguez, A
Patard, JJ
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Sch Med, Dept Urol, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[2] CHU Henri Mondor, Dept Urol, F-94010 Creteil, France
[3] CHU Pontchaillou, Dept Urol, Rennes, France
关键词
carcinoma; renal clear cell; prognosis; survival;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04505.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To develop a model to predict the outcome before surgery for non-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The records of 660 patients with non-metastatic RCC, operated at three European medical institutes, were reviewed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to assess the clinical and pathological variables affecting disease-free survival. The median (range) follow-up was 42 (2-180) months; the disease recurred in 110 patients (16%). The 2- and 5-year overall survival was 87% and 54%, respectively. Five variables were significant in the univariate analysis, i.e. clinical presentation, clinical and pathological size, tumour grade and stage (P<0.05). The preoperative variables, e.g. clinical presentation and clinical tumour size, were retained from the multivariate model. A recurrence risk formula (RRF) was constructed from this model, as (1.28 x presentation (asymptomatic=0; symptomatic=1) + (0.13 x clinical size)). Using this equation, the 2- and 5-year disease-free survival was 96% and 93% for an RRF of less than or equal to1.2 and 83% and 68% for an RRF of >1.2. A formula was developed which, independent of stage, can be used to predict the rate of treatment failure in patients who undergo nephrectomy for non-metastatic RCC. The RRF might be useful for more accurate sub-grouping of good-prognosis patients, and for counselling patients before surgery, their personalized follow-up or adjuvant treatment once available.
引用
收藏
页码:901 / 905
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Prognostic impact of histologic Subtyping of adult renal epithelial neoplasms - An experience of 405 cases [J].
Amin, MB ;
Amin, MB ;
Tamboli, P ;
Javidan, J ;
Stricker, H ;
Venturina, MD ;
Deshpande, A ;
Menon, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 26 (03) :281-291
[2]  
BRETHEAU D, 1995, EUR UROL, V27, P319
[3]  
Cindolo L, 2001, Minerva Urol Nefrol, V53, P211
[4]   Prognostic importance of tumor size for localized conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma - Assessment of TNM T1 and T2 tumor categories and comparison with other prognostic parameters [J].
Delahunt, B ;
Kittelson, JM ;
McCredie, MRE ;
Reeve, AE ;
Stewart, JH ;
Bilous, AM .
CANCER, 2002, 94 (03) :658-664
[5]  
Drevs J, 2002, CANCER RES, V62, P4015
[6]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF MORPHOLOGIC PARAMETERS IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
FUHRMAN, SA ;
LASKY, LC ;
LIMAS, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1982, 6 (07) :655-663
[7]  
Gelb AB, 1997, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V80, P1768, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19971101)80:9<1768::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-3
[9]  
Guinan P, 1997, CANCER, V80, P992, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970901)80:5<992::AID-CNCR26>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-Q