Microbial investigation in ventilator-associated pneumonia

被引:57
作者
Ioanas, M
Ferrer, R
Angrill, J
Ferrer, M
Torres, A
机构
[1] Hosp Clin Barcelona, Inst Clin Pneumol & Cirurgia Torac, Serv Pneumol, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[2] Inst Natl Pneumoftiziol Marius Nasta, Bucharest, Romania
[3] Hosp Parc Tauli, Unidad Cuidados Intens, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
bronchoalveolar lavage; microbiology; protected specimen brush; pulmonary infections; ventilator-associated pneumonia;
D O I
10.1183/09031936.01.17407910
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a serious infectious in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, currently related to a high mortality rate. Therefore, this complication of mechanical ventilation requires a prompt diagnosis adequate antibiotic treatment. The detection of the causative organism is imperative guiding an appropriate therapy as there is strong evidence of the adverse effect inadequate empirical treatment on outcome. The major difficulty of the investigation is to obtain the sample from the lower respiratory tract, mainly because of the potential contamination with upper airways flora, which may result in a misinterpretation of the cultures. Microbial investigation in VAP is based on the culture of samples obtained from lower respiratory tract by noninvasive or invasive methods. The most common techniques of sampling are the endotracheal aspirate (ETA), which is considered a noninvasive method, the protected specimen brush (PSB) and the bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), both being invasive methods of investigation. The latter were designed as an attempt to avoid the colonizing flora of the upper airways. The hest of these diagnostic approaches is still controversial. In terms of outcome, there is strong evidence that the impact of Bath invasive and noninvasive methods seems to be similar, In terms of cost, however, the endotracheal aspirate is less expensive compared to BAL or PSB. On the other hand, invasive methods could be particularly beneficial in patients who are not responding to the initial empirical antibiotic treatment. The rationale for the quantitative culture of the respiratory samples is to differentiate between infection and colonization of lower airways, because the bacterial colonization is a frequent event in mechanically ventilated patients. The thresholds currently employed for the diagnosis of the pneumonia are the following: ETA samples, greater than or equal to 10(5)-10(6) units (cfu).mL(-1); PSB samples, greater than or equal to 10(3) cfu.mL(-1). and BAL samples, greater than or equal to 10(4) cfu.mL(-1). Intending to provide a practical approach to the issue, the present manuscript reviews the available noninvasive (blood culture, endotracheal aspirate) and invasive (protected brush, bronchoalveolar lavage, blinded methods and lung biopsy) techniques for the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
引用
收藏
页码:791 / 801
页数:11
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Modification of empiric antibiotic treatment in patients with pneumonia acquired in the intensive care unit
    AlvarezLerma, F
    Pellus, AM
    Sanchez, BA
    Ortiz, EP
    Jorda, R
    Barcenilla, F
    Maravi, E
    Galvan, B
    Palomar, M
    Serra, J
    Bermejo, B
    Mateu, A
    Quintana, E
    Palacios, MS
    Giral, R
    Gonzalez, V
    Lerma, FA
    Mesa, JL
    Melgarejo, JA
    Martinez, J
    Insausti, J
    Olaechea, P
    Chanovas, M
    Gilabert, A
    Junquera, C
    Valles, J
    Palacios, F
    Calvo, R
    Mesalles, E
    Nava, J
    Santos, A
    Armengol, S
    Marzo, D
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1996, 22 (05) : 387 - 394
  • [2] BRONCHOALVEOLAR LAVAGE FOR DIAGNOSING BACTERIAL PNEUMONIA IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS
    AUBAS, S
    AUBAS, P
    CAPDEVILA, X
    DARBAS, H
    ROUSTAN, JP
    DUCAILAR, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 149 (04) : 860 - 866
  • [3] Protected bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia
    Barreiro, B
    Dorca, J
    Manresa, F
    Catala, I
    Esteban, L
    Verdaguer, R
    Gudiol, F
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 1996, 9 (07) : 1500 - 1507
  • [4] BARTLETT J, 1989, RESP INFECT DIAGNOST
  • [5] BAUGHMAN RP, 1991, CHEST, P233
  • [6] BLASI F, 1997, EUR RESP MON, V3, P157
  • [7] BACTEREMIC NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA - ANALYSIS OF 172 EPISODES FROM A SINGLE METROPOLITAN AREA
    BRYAN, CS
    REYNOLDS, KL
    [J]. AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1984, 129 (05): : 668 - 671
  • [8] PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF ASPIRATION NEEDLE, CUTTING NEEDLE, TRANS-BRONCHIAL, AND OPEN LUNG-BIOPSY IN PATIENTS WITH PULMONARY-INFILTRATES
    BURT, ME
    FLYE, MW
    WEBBER, BL
    PATH, FF
    WESLEY, RA
    [J]. ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1981, 32 (02) : 146 - 152
  • [9] Campbell GD, 1996, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V153, P1711
  • [10] NOSOCOMIAL PNEUMONIA - A MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF RISK AND PROGNOSIS
    CELIS, R
    TORRES, A
    GATELL, JM
    ALMELA, M
    RODRIGUEZROISIN, R
    AGUSTIVIDAL, A
    [J]. CHEST, 1988, 93 (02) : 318 - 324