Using and abusing rates of return: A critique of the World Bank's 1995 education sector review

被引：42

作者：

Bennell, P

机构：

[1] Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT | 1996年 / 16卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/0738-0593(96)00016-8

中图分类号：

G40 [教育学];

学科分类号：

040101 ; 120403 ;

摘要：

The World Bank's 1995 Education Sector Review relies very heavily on conventional rates of return to education (RORE) analysis in support of three (out of a total of six) key recommendations. This paper (i) critically examines how the Review draws on RORE research, (ii) shows that none of the alleged global RORE patterns exist; and (iii) more generally, questions the role of RORE analysis as an economic tool for education policy makers. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd

引用

页码：235 / 248

页数：14

共 14 条

[1]

Albrecht D., 1992, PHREE BACKGROUND PAP

[2]

[Anonymous], E AS MIR EC GROWTH P

[3] Rates of return to education: Does the conventional pattern prevail in sub-Saharan Africa? [J].