Performance measurement versus city service satisfaction: Intra-city variations in quality?

被引:38
作者
Swindell, D
Kelly, J
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Polit Sci, Charlotte, NC 28223 USA
[2] Cleveland State Univ, Cleveland, OH 44115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.0038-4941.2005.00325.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Objective. This article illustrates the usefulness of citizen satisfaction surveys to account for variation in citizen satisfaction with public-service quality within a city's boundaries. Methods. The article examines data from 17 local governments and divided into 141 spatial areas to investigate the distribution of satisfaction within cities (as an outcome measure) and the effect of SES variables on variation in satisfaction with jointly consumed services. Results. Satisfaction varies within cities, not all of which is attributable to SES characteristics. This suggests substantive variation in service quality. Conclusions. Local governments interested in developing meaningful performance measures of service outcomes should incorporate properly designed citizen satisfaction surveys implemented at the service-district level. In addition, performance indicators of service inputs and outputs should be disaggregated to the service-district level and matched to citizen satisfaction results in order to allocate and tailor resource policy decisions in a more informed manner.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / 723
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ANTUNES G, 1977, URBAN AFF QUART, V4, P343
[2]  
Barzelay Michael., 1992, BREAKING BUREAUCRACY
[3]  
BLANK B, 1969, URBAN AFF QUART, V4, P344
[4]  
BOLTIN FN, 1983, J POLIT, V45, P209
[5]   SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE MEASURES OF POLICE SERVICE DELIVERY [J].
BROWN, K ;
COULTER, PB .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1983, 43 (01) :50-58
[6]  
CINGRANELLI DL, 1981, AM J POLIT SCI, V35, P664
[7]  
CLARK TN, 1976, CITIZEN PREFERENCES, P13
[8]  
Feiock R. C., 1986, J URBAN AFF, V8, P31, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1467-9906.1986.TB00146.X
[9]  
FOLZ DH, 1986, PUBLIC PRODUCTIVITY, V40, P21
[10]  
Goodsell Charles., 2004, CASE BUREAUCRACY PUB, DOI 10.2307/3323623