The change in allograft function among long-term kidney transplant recipients

被引:95
作者
Gill, JS
Tonelli, M
Mix, CH
Pereira, BJG
机构
[1] Tufts Univ New England Med Ctr, Div Nephrol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] St Pauls Hosp, Div Nephrol, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Div Nephrol, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2003年 / 14卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.ASN.0000070621.06264.86
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Long-term kidney allograft survival continues to remain an elusive goal. Kidney transplant recipients are believed to be at high risk for loss of allograft function, and new, potentially non-nephrotoxic immunosuppressive medications are advocated to improve long-term allograft survival. To evaluate the efficacy of such therapeutic interventions, information regarding the change in GFR among kidney transplant recipients with long-term allograft survival is needed. We studied 40,963 transplant recipients between 1987 and 1996 with allograft survival of at least 2 yr in the United States Renal Data System. Linear regression methods were applied to serial GFR estimates after transplantation. The baseline mean GFR at 6 mo after transplantation was 49.6 +/- 15.4 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). During the mean follow-up of 5.7 +/- 2.3 yr, the mean +/- standard error of the change in GFR was -1.66 +/- 6.51 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) per year (median, -0.94 L/min per 1.73 m(2) per year). A total of 12,583 (30%) of patients had improvement in GFR, 8133 (20%) patients had no change in GFR, and 20,247 (50%) patients had decline in GFR. It is concluded that, although most patients had significant impairment of GFR at baseline, the decline in GFR was slow and many patients had either no change or improvement in GFR. Strategies to improve long-term kidney allograft survival that increase baseline allograft function may be more effective than strategies to slow the decline in GFR.
引用
收藏
页码:1636 / 1642
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Applied Linear Regression Models
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, J AM SOC NEPHROL
[3]  
Armitage P., 2002, Statistical Methods in Medical Research, V4th, P312
[4]   DETECTION OF INFLUENTIAL OBSERVATION IN LINEAR-REGRESSION [J].
COOK, RD .
TECHNOMETRICS, 1977, 19 (01) :15-18
[5]   THE QUANTITATIVE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TREATED BLOOD-PRESSURE AND PROGRESSION OF DIABETIC RENAL-DISEASE [J].
DILLON, JJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 1993, 22 (06) :798-802
[6]   K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification - Foreword [J].
Eknoyan, G ;
Levin, NW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (02) :S14-S266
[7]   Optimal strategies for modeling the reciprocal of creatinine versus time in renal transplant recipients and patients with native chronic renal disease [J].
Fink, JC ;
Blahut, SA ;
Weir, MF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (04) :753-761
[8]   Opportunities to improve the care of patients with kidney transplant failure [J].
Gill, JS ;
Abichandani, R ;
Khan, S ;
Kausz, AT ;
Pereira, BJG .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 61 (06) :2193-2200
[9]  
GRAETZ K, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P892
[10]   Withdrawal of cyclosporine or prednisone six months after kidney transplantation in patients on triple drug therapy:: A randomized, prospective, multicenter study [J].
Gregoor, PJHS ;
De Sévaux, RGL ;
Ligtenberg, G ;
Hoitsma, AJ ;
Hené, RJ ;
Weimar, W ;
Hilbrands, LB ;
Van Gelder, T .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (05) :1365-1373