The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery

被引:808
作者
Agha, Riaz Ahmed [1 ]
Borrelli, Mimi R. [1 ]
Vella-Baldacchino, Martinique [2 ]
Thavayogan, Rachel [3 ]
Orgill, Dennis P. [4 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Plast Surg, London, England
[2] John Radcliffe Hosp, Dept Emergency Surg, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Nottingham, England
[4] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Plast Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
Reporting guideline; Cohort studies; Cross-sectional; Case-control studies; CRITICAL-APPRAISAL; READERS GUIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.586
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The development of reporting guidelines over the past 20 years represents a major advance in scholarly publishing with recent evidence showing positive impacts. Whilst over 350 reporting guidelines exist, there are few that are specific to surgery. Here we describe the development of the STROCSS guideline (Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery). Methods and analysis: We published our protocol apriori. Current guidelines for case series (PROCESS), cohort studies (STROBE) and randomised controlled trials (CONSORT) were analysed to compile a list of items which were used as baseline material for developing a suitable checklist for surgical cohort guidelines. These were then put forward in a Delphi consensus exercise to an expert panel of 74 surgeons and academics via Google Forms. Results: The Delphi exercise was completed by 62% (46/74) of the participants. All the items were passed in a single round to create a STROCSS guideline consisting of 17 items. Conclusion: We present the STROCSS guideline for surgical cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies consisting of a 17-item checklist. We hope its use will increase the transparency and reporting quality of such studies. This guideline is also suitable for cross-sectional and case control studies. We encourage authors, reviewers, journal editors and publishers to adopt these guidelines. (C) 2017 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 202
页数:5
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Agha RA, 2017, INT J SURG PROTOC, V5, P15, DOI 10.1016/j.isjp.2017.08.001
[2]   Preferred reporting of case series in surgery; the PROCESS guidelines [J].
Agha, Riaz A. ;
Fowler, Alexander J. ;
Rajmohan, Shivanchan ;
Barai, Ishani ;
Orgill, Dennis P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 36 :319-323
[3]   Levels of evidence in plastic surgery—bibliometric trends and comparison with five other surgical specialties [J].
Agha R.A. ;
Devesa M. ;
Whitehurst K. ;
Fowler A.J. ;
Coe R. ;
Wellstead G. ;
Orgill D.P. ;
McCulloch P. .
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2016, 39 (5) :365-370
[4]   Reporting Quality of Observational Studies in Plastic Surgery Needs Improvement: A Systematic Review [J].
Agha, Riaz Ahmed ;
Lee, Seon-Young ;
Jeong, Kyung Jin Lee ;
Fowler, Alexander J. ;
Orgill, Dennis P. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2016, 76 (05) :585-589
[5]   CONSORT Statement for Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatments: A 2017 Update and a CONSORT Extension for Nonpharmacologic Trial Abstracts [J].
Boutron, Isabelle ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Moher, David ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Ravaud, Philippe .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, 167 (01) :40-+
[6]   Reader's guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 2. Assessing potential for confounding [J].
Mamdani, M ;
Sykora, K ;
Li, P ;
Normand, SLT ;
Streiner, DL ;
Austin, PC ;
Rochon, PA ;
Anderson, GM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7497) :960-962
[7]   Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines [J].
Moher, David ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Simera, Iveta ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (02)
[8]   Readers guide to critical appraisal of cohort studies: 3. Analytical strategies to reduce confounding [J].
Normand, SLT ;
Sykora, K ;
Li, P ;
Mamdani, M ;
Rochon, PA ;
Anderson, GM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7498) :1021-1023
[9]   Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies [J].
Sinha, Ian P. ;
Smyth, Rosalind L. ;
Williamson, Paula R. .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2011, 8 (01)