Anesthesia matters: Patients anesthetized with propofol have less postoperative pain than those anesthetized with isoflurane

被引:101
作者
Cheng, Sean S. [1 ]
Yeh, Janet [1 ]
Flood, Pamela [1 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000287653.77372.d9
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Preclinical studies have suggested that some volatile anesthetics induce a hyperalgesic state that may be secondary to nicotinic inhibition. A previous trial of treatment with nicotine nasal spray demonstrated postoperative analgesia in women anesthetized with isoflurane. To determine whether the effect of nicotine was reversing hyperalgesia induced by isoflurane, or simply acting as an analgesic, we studied the effect of nicotine on postoperative pain in women anesthetized with isoflurane or propofol, with fentanyl. METHODS: In a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial, we assigned 80 women having open uterine surgery to be anesthetized with isoflurane or propofol. Within each anesthetic group, the subjects were further randomly assigned to receive nicotine 3 mg or placebo. Pain reported with a numerical analog scale was the primary outcome variable. RESULTS: The patient demographics were similar. Women who were anesthetized with propofol reported less pain and used less morphine during the first day after surgery than women who were anesthetized with isoflurane (P < 0.01, P < 0.01). Nicotine treatment did not change pain report or morphine use in either anesthetic group (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia with propofol and is associated with less postoperative pain and morphine use than general anesthesia with isoflurane. Nicotine was not analgesic in this trial. If these results are repeated in other populations, reduced postoperative pain can be added to the previously described improvement in nausea and vomiting as a potential benefit of anesthesia with propofol.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 269
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Sources of variability in nicotine and cotinine levels with use of nicotine nasal spray, transdermal nicotine, and cigarette smoking [J].
Benowitz, NL ;
Zevin, S ;
Jacob, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 43 (03) :259-267
[2]   COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF DIISOPROPYL PHENOL ICI-35868 AND THIOPENTONE ON RESPONSE TO SOMATIC PAIN [J].
BRIGGS, LP ;
DUNDEE, JW ;
BAHAR, M ;
CLARKE, RSJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1982, 54 (03) :307-311
[3]   ALTERATIONS IN RESPONSE TO SOMATIC PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH ANAESTHESIA .4. THE EFFECT OF SUB-ANAESTHETIC CONCENTRATIONS OF INHALATION AGENTS [J].
DUNDEE, JW ;
MOORE, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1960, 32 (10) :453-459
[4]   Recovery profile after desflurane with or without ondansetron compared with propofol in patients undergoing outpatient gynecological laparoscopy [J].
Eriksson, H ;
Korttila, K .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (03) :533-538
[5]  
Fishbein L, 2000, J INVEST MED, V48, P435
[6]  
Flood P, 2004, ANESTHESIOLOGY, V101, P1417
[7]   alpha 4 beta 2 neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the central nervous system are inhibited by isoflurane and propofol, but alpha 7-type nicotinic acetylcholine receptors are unaffected [J].
Flood, P ;
RamirezLatorre, J ;
Role, L .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1997, 86 (04) :859-865
[8]   Isofurane hyperalgesia is modulated by nicotinic inhibition [J].
Flood, P ;
Sonner, JM ;
Gong, D ;
Coates, KM .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (01) :192-198
[9]  
Goldstein Frederick J., 2002, Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, V102, pS15
[10]   Arterial/venous plasma nicotine concentrations following nicotine nasal spray [J].
Guthrie, SK ;
Zubieta, JK ;
Ohl, L ;
Ni, L ;
Koeppe, RA ;
Minoshima, S ;
Domino, EF .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1999, 55 (09) :639-643