Tissue toxicity of antiseptics

被引:35
作者
Kalteis, T [1 ]
Lüring, C [1 ]
Schaumburger, J [1 ]
Perlick, L [1 ]
Bäthis, H [1 ]
Grifka, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Regensburg, Orthopad Klin, D-93077 Bad Abbach, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE | 2003年 / 141卷 / 02期
关键词
antiseptics; tissue compatibility; wound; HET-CAM;
D O I
10.1055/s-2003-38654
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: Local antiseptics are used for desinfection of skin and for lavage of wounds. The aim of this study was. to determine the tissue toxicity of different antiseptics and to measure the irritation score (IS) and the irritation threshold (IT) for each substance. Method: The tissue compatibilities of Dibromol(R), Kodan(R), Jodobac(R), Octenisept(R), Lavasept(R) 0.2%, hydrogen peroxide, chlorhexidindigluconate 0.5% and 2-propanol 60% were evaluated in the in vivo hens eggs chorion-allantoic membrane test (HET-CAM). Results: We found the most severe tissue toxicity for chlorhexidin digluconate 0.5% (IS 20) and Kodan(R) (IS 18). Irritating values were found for Dibromol(R) (IS 14), Octenisept(R) (IS 14) and 2-propanol 60% (IS 13). Moderate vascular injuries were caused by Jodobac(R) (IS 2). In the HET-CAM test Lavasept(R) 0.2% (IS 0) and hydrogen peroxide (IS 0) showed no tissue toxicity. Conclusion: Our results show that some of the tested antiseptics might cause severe vascular injuries as a sign of tissue toxicity. The tissue compatibility of Lavasept(R) 0.2% and hydrogen peroxide is much better than the compatibility of the other tested substances. With focus on the literature and our results, Lavasept(R) 0.2% can be recommended as the local antiseptic of choice.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 238
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]
Adam C, 1993, HYG MED, V18, P9
[2]
Dilute povidone-iodine solutions inhibit human skin fibroblast growth [J].
Balin, AK ;
Pratt, L .
DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2002, 28 (03) :210-214
[3]
Bennett LL, 2001, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V108, P675, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200109010-00011
[4]
THE EFFECT OF ANTISEPTICS ON THE HEALING WOUND - A STUDY USING THE RABBIT EAR CHAMBER [J].
BRENNAN, SS ;
LEAPER, DJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1985, 72 (10) :780-782
[5]
*BUND, 1990, ARB HET CAM MAKR
[6]
Method for testing non-steroidal anti-inflammatories: The modified hen's egg chorioallantoic membrane test (HET-CAM test) compared to other procedures [J].
Dannhardt, G ;
Kreher, M ;
Nowe, U ;
Pies, A .
ARCHIV DER PHARMAZIE, 1996, 329 (06) :301-310
[7]
KALLENBERGER A, 1991, HYG MED, V16, P383
[8]
TOXIC EFFECTS OF WOUND IRRIGATION SOLUTIONS ON CULTURED TIBIAE AND OSTEOBLASTS [J].
KAYSINGER, KK ;
NICHOLSON, NC ;
RAMP, WK ;
KELLAM, JF .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 1995, 9 (04) :303-311
[9]
KJOLSETH D, 1994, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V179, P305
[10]
Kramer A, 1998, CHIRURG, V69, P840, DOI 10.1007/s001040050498