Single-dose, sustained-release epidural morphine in the management of postoperative pain after elective Cesarean delivery: Results of a multicenter randomized controlled study

被引:65
作者
Carvalho, B
Riley, E
Cohen, SE
Gambling, D
Palmer, C
Huffnagle, HJ
Polley, L
Muir, H
Segal, S
Lihou, C
Manvelian, G
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesia, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Sharp Mary Birch Hosp Women, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Tucson, AZ USA
[4] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[6] Duke Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Durham, NC USA
[7] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] SkyePharma Inc, San Diego, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ANE.0000149544.58230.FF
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
In this multicenter, randomized, controlled study, we compared the analgesic efficacy and safety profile of a new single-dose extended-release epidural morphine (EREM) formulation (DepoDur (TM)) with that of epidural morphine sulfate for the management of postoperative pain for up to 48 h after elective cesarean delivery. ASA physical status I or II parturients (n = 75) were anesthetized with a combined spinal/epidural technique. Parturients received intrathecal bupivacaine 12-15 mg and fentanyl 10 mu g for spinal anesthesia and a single epidural injection of either 5 mg of standard (conventional preservative-free) morphine or 5, 10, or 15 mg of extended-release morphine after cord clamping for postoperative pain control. Single-dose EREM 10 and 15 mg groups significantly decreased total supplemental opioid medication use and improved functional ability scores for 48 h after surgery compared with those receiving 5 mg of standard morphine. Visual analog scale pain scores at rest and with activity at 24 to 48 h after dosing were significantly. better in the 10- and 15-mg single-dose EREM groups versus the standard morphine group. There were no significant differences between the two 5 mg (single-dose EREM and standard morphine) groups. Single-dose EREM was well tolerated, and most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Single-dose EREM is a potentially beneficial epidural analgesic for the management of post-cesarean delivery pain and has particular advantages over standard morphine for the period from 24 to 48 h after surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1150 / 1158
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   A randomized controlled trial examining the effect of naproxen on analgesia during the second day after cesarean delivery [J].
Angle, PJ ;
Halpern, SH ;
Leighton, BL ;
Szalai, JP ;
Gnanendran, K ;
Kronberg, JE .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (03) :741-745
[2]  
Barton M, 1996, Aust Coll Midwives Inc J, V9, P14, DOI 10.1016/S1031-170X(96)80018-3
[3]   Small doses of intrathecal morphine combined with systemic diclofenac for postoperative pain control after cesarean delivery [J].
Cardoso, MMSC ;
Carvalho, JCA ;
Amaro, AR ;
Prado, AA ;
Cappelli, EL .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 86 (03) :538-541
[4]  
Chumpathong Saowapark, 2002, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, V85, pS956
[5]  
COHEN SE, 1991, REGION ANESTH, V16, P141
[6]   Pain relief and safety after major surgery -: A prospective study of epidural and intravenous analgesia in 2696 patients [J].
Flisberg, P ;
Rudin, Å ;
Linnér, R ;
Lundberg, CJF .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2003, 47 (04) :457-465
[7]   EPIDURAL MORPHINE FOR ANALGESIA AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION - A REPORT OF 4880 PATIENTS [J].
FULLER, JG ;
MCMORLAND, GH ;
DOUGLAS, MJ ;
PALMER, L .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1990, 37 (06) :636-640
[8]   The effect of postoperative analgesia with continuous epidural bupivacaine after cesarean section on the amount of breast feeding and infant weight gain [J].
Hirose, M ;
Hara, Y ;
Hosokawa, T ;
Tanaka, Y .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (06) :1166-1169
[9]  
Howell SB, 2001, CANCER J, V7, P219
[10]   Postcesarean epidural morphine: A dose-response study [J].
Palmer, CM ;
Nogami, WM ;
Van Maren, G ;
Alves, DM .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 90 (04) :887-891