The effectiveness of hylan G-F 20 in patients with knee osteoarthritis: an application of two sets of response criteria developed by the OARSI and one set developed by OMERACT-OARSI

被引:25
作者
Bellamy, N
Bell, MJ
Goldsmith, CH
Pericak, D
Walker, V
Raynauld, JP
Torrance, GW
Tugwell, P
Polisson, R
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, CONROD, Fac Hlth Sci, Mayne Med Sch, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
[2] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook & Womens Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Innovus Res Inc, Burlington, ON, Canada
[5] Montreal Inst Rheumatol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[6] Univ Ottawa, Ctr Global Hlth, Inst Populat Hlth, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[7] Genzyme Corp, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
effectiveness; hylan G-F 20; osteoarthritis; randomized controlled trial; responder criteria;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2004.10.016
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Secondary analyses of a previously conducted 1-year randomized controlled trial were performed to assess the application of responder criteria in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) using different sets of responder criteria developed by the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) (Propositions A and B) for intra-articular drugs and Outcome Measures in Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT)-OARSI (Proposition D). Methods: Two hundred fifty-five patients with knee OA were randomized to "appropriate care with hylan G-F 20" (AC + H) or "appropriate care without hylan G-F 20" (AC). A patient was defined as a responder at month 12 based on change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and function (0-100 normalized scale) and patient global assessment of OA in the study knee (at least one-category improvement in very poor, poor, fair, good and very good). All propositions incorporate both minimum relative and absolute changes. Results: Results demonstrated that statistically significant differences in responders between treatment groups, in favor of hylan G-F 20, were detected for Proposition A (AC + H = 53.5%, AC = 25.2%), Proposition B (AC + H = 56.7%, AC = 32.3%) and Proposition D (AC + H = 66.9%, AC = 42.5%). The highest effectiveness in both treatment groups was observed with Proposition D, whereas Proposition A resulted in the lowest effectiveness in both treatment groups. The treatment group differences always exceeded the required 20% minimum clinically important difference between groups established a priori, and were 28.3%, 24.4% and 24.4% for Propositions A, B and D, respectively. Conclusion: This analysis provides evidence for the capacity of OARSI and OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria to detect clinically important statistically detectable differences between treatment groups. (C) 2004 OsteoArthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 110
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]
Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: Recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society - Results from a workshop [J].
Altman, R ;
Brandt, K ;
Hochberg, M ;
MOskowitz, R ;
Bellamy, N ;
Bloch, DA ;
Buckwalter, J ;
Dougados, M ;
Ehrlich, G ;
Lequesne, M ;
Lohmander, S ;
Murphy, WA ;
RosarioJansen, T ;
Schwartz, B ;
Trippel, S .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1996, 4 (04) :217-243
[2]
Beaton DE, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P400
[3]
Bellamy N, 2002, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V46, pS159
[4]
Bellamy N, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P799
[5]
Bellamy N, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P427
[6]
BELLAMY N, 2005, ARTHRITIS ALLIED CON, P51
[7]
Bellamy N, 1993, MUSCULOSKELETAL CLIN
[8]
Response criteria for clinical trials on osteoarthritis of the knee and hip - A report of The Osteoarthritis Research Society International Standing Committee for Clinical Trials Response Criteria Initiative [J].
Dougados, M ;
LeClaire, P ;
van der Heijde, D ;
Bloch, DA ;
Bellamy, N ;
Altman, RD .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2000, 8 (06) :395-403
[9]
Ehrich EW, 2000, J RHEUMATOL, V27, P2635
[10]
AMERICAN-COLLEGE-OF-RHEUMATOLOGY PRELIMINARY DEFINITION OF IMPROVEMENT IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS [J].
FELSON, DT ;
ANDERSON, JJ ;
BOERS, M ;
BOMBARDIER, C ;
FURST, D ;
GOLDSMITH, C ;
KATZ, LM ;
LIGHTFOOT, R ;
PAULUS, H ;
STRAND, V ;
TUGWELL, P ;
WEINBLATT, M ;
WILLIAMS, HJ ;
WOLFE, F ;
KIESZAK, S .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1995, 38 (06) :727-735