Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer

被引:1252
作者
Wei, JT
Dunn, RL
Litwin, MS
Sandler, HM
Sanda, MG
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Vet Affairs Ctr Practice Management & Outcomes Re, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Natl Canc Inst Special Project Res Excellence Pro, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Surg, Urol Sect, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Canc Ctr Biostat Core, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[7] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00858-X
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is an increasingly important endpoint in prostate cancer care. However, pivotal issues that are not fully assessed in existing HRQOL instruments include irritative urinary symptoms, hormonal symptoms, and multi-item scores quantifying bother between urinary, sexual, bowel, and hormonal domains, We sought to develop a novel instrument to facilitate more comprehensive assessment of prostate cancer-related HRQOL. Methods. Instrument development was based on advice from an expert panel and prostate cancer patients, which led to expanding the 20-item University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI) to the 50-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC). Summary and subscale scores were derived by content and factor analyses. Reliability and validity were assessed by test-retest correlation, Cronbach's alpha coefficient, interscale correlation, and EPIC correlation with other validated instruments. Results. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were high for EPIC urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal domain summary scores (each r greater than or equal to0.80 and Cronbach's alpha greater than or equal to0.82) and for most domain-specific subscales. Correlations between function and bother subscales within domains were high (r > 0.60). Correlations between different primary domains were consistently lower, indicating that these domains assess distinct HRQOL components. EPIC domains had weak to modest correlations with the Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), indicating rationale for their concurrent use. Moderate agreement was observed between EPIC domains relevant to the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Prostate module (FACT-P) and the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI), providing criterion validity without excessive overlap. Conclusions. EPIC is a robust prostate cancer HRQOL instrument that complements prior instruments by measuring a broad spectrum of urinary, bowel, sexual, and hormonal symptoms, thereby providing a unique tool for comprehensive assessment of HRQOL issues important in contemporary prostate cancer management. UROLOGY 56: 899-905, 2000. (C) 2000, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 905
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   THE AMERICAN-UROLOGICAL-ASSOCIATION SYMPTOM INDEX FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA [J].
BARRY, MJ ;
FOWLER, FJ ;
OLEARY, MP ;
BRUSKEWITZ, RC ;
HOLTGREWE, HL ;
MEBUST, WK ;
COCKETT, ATK ;
BLAIVAS, JG ;
WEIN, AJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 148 (05) :1549-1557
[2]   Editorial: Quality of life and prostate cancer treatment [J].
Barry, MJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) :407-407
[3]   Measurement of quality of life in localized prostatic cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. Development of a prostate cancer-specific module supplementing the EORTC QLQ-C30 [J].
Borghede, G ;
Sullivan, M .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1996, 5 (02) :212-222
[4]   THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE [J].
CELLA, DF ;
TULSKY, DS ;
GRAY, G ;
SARAFIAN, B ;
LINN, E ;
BONOMI, A ;
SILBERMAN, M ;
YELLEN, SB ;
WINICOUR, P ;
BRANNON, J ;
ECKBERG, K ;
LLOYD, S ;
PURL, S ;
BLENDOWSKI, C ;
GOODMAN, M ;
BARNICLE, M ;
STEWART, I ;
MCHALE, M ;
BONOMI, P ;
KAPLAN, E ;
TAYLOR, S ;
THOMAS, CR ;
HARRIS, J .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) :570-579
[5]  
D'Amico AV, 1999, CANCER, V86, P1632, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19991101)86:9<1632::AID-CNCR2>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-5
[7]   Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy prostate instrument [J].
Esper, P ;
Mo, F ;
Chodak, G ;
Sinner, M ;
Cella, D ;
Pienta, KJ .
UROLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) :920-928
[8]   Trends and black/white differences in treatment for nonmetastatic prostate cancer [J].
Klabunde, CN ;
Potosky, AL ;
Harlan, LC ;
Kramer, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (09) :1337-1348
[9]   The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index - Development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure [J].
Litwin, MS ;
Hays, RD ;
Fink, A ;
Ganz, PA ;
Leake, B ;
Brook, RH .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (07) :1002-1012
[10]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE OUTCOMES IN MEN FOR LOCALIZED PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
LITWIN, MS ;
HAYS, RD ;
FINK, A ;
GANZ, PA ;
LEAKE, B ;
LEACH, GE ;
BROOK, RH .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (02) :129-135