Why Britain is reorganizing its national health service - Yet again

被引:52
作者
Klein, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] London Sch Econ, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.17.4.111
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Labour government's 1997 plans for Britain's National Health Service (NHS) have been presented as a reaction to the reforms introduced by its Conservative predecessor in 1991. But to a large extent they build on the Conservative legacy. The centerpiece of the Labour reform-managed care organizations based on groups of primary care physicians-is based on the Conservative experiment with general practitioner fund holding. Welcomed when published, Labour's plans may arouse opposition in implementation, for they imply greater central control and threaten medical autonomy. If the political costs are to be contained, Labour may have to choose between increasing spending on the NHS or making concessions to the medical profession-and quite possibly have to do both.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 125
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Implementing GP Fundholding: Wild Card or Winning Hand?
[2]  
*AUD COMM, 1996, DOCT ORD STUD GP FUN
[3]   Taking equity seriously: a dilemma for government from allocating resources to primary care groups [J].
Bevan, G .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 316 (7124) :39-42
[4]  
Enthoven A.C., 1985, REFLECTIONS MANAGEME
[5]  
GODDARD M, 1997, CONTRACTING UK NHS P
[6]  
Ham C, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P70
[7]  
JAMES JH, 1994, TRANSFORMING NHS VIE
[8]  
Klein R., 1996, MANAGING SCARCITY
[9]  
Klein R., 1995, The New Politics of the National Health Service
[10]   Knights, knaves or pawns? Human behaviour and social policy [J].
LeGrand, J .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 1997, 26 :149-169