Aggressive intervention for myocardial infraction: Angioplasty, stents, and intra-aortic balloon pumping

Nevertheless, several groups have conclusively proved the benefit of primary PTCA over thrombolysis. In a 1995 meta-analysis, PTCA proved superior to thrombolytic therapy in reducing death and reinfarction. The Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries (GUSTO-IIB) substudy confirmed this fact with 94% certainty. Other studies were designed to refine the angioplasty technique. In the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-I) study, acute catheterization was used to stratify patients and identified a low-risk population whose mortality equaled that of patients treated electively. Compared with clinical risk factors, angiographic findings enhanced the power to predict mortality threefold. The high-risk subset with acute myocardial infarction (MI) was also randomized to treatment with or without prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP). Although IABP caused no complications, it has no positive effect on primary endpoints (death, recurrent MI, and reocclusion) and did not improve left ventricular function at 6 months. One limitation of primary PTCA is a high rate of late restenosis (30-50% at 6 months). In a pilot study we are examining the role of stents in conjunction with primary PTCA. Early results indicate that in the 69% of patients eligible for stent placement, in-hospital events were uncommon (no deaths, no reinfarctions, low rate of recurrent ischemia) and the need for repeat revascularization was infrequent.