Bone strength influences periprosthetic bone loss after hip arthroplasty

被引:4
作者
Arabmotlagh, M [1 ]
Hennigs, T [1 ]
Warzecha, J [1 ]
Rittmeister, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Frankfurt, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Frankfurt, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.blo.0000176148.39380.ff
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Our primary question was whether bone strength at the time of surgery, reflected by the lumbar spine T-score and femoral cortical thickness, influences periprosthetic bone loss after a total hip arthroplasty. Using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry we preoperatively and postoperatively examined 38 consecutive patients having cementless total hip arthroplasties for their bone density. Bone strength was estimated using lumbar spine bone mineral density and the ipsilateral diaphyseal cortical thickness of the femur measured on radiographs. Periprosthetic femoral bone mineral density was measured with dual energy xray absorptiometry within I week postoperatively and at 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 24 months thereafter. Periprosthetic bone loss was influenced by the patient's bone strength at the time of surgery. Bone loss in the calcar femoris (as much as 54% after 2 years) was greater in patients with a low lumbar spine T-score or low femoral cortical thickness. Preoperative assessment of bone strength (ie, lumbar spine bone mineral density and femoral cortical thickness on radiographs) served as a reliable indicator in predicting the extent of periprosthetic bone loss after total hip arthroplasty. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Study, Level I (high quality prospective study-all patients were enrolled at the same point in their disease with >= 80% followup of enrolled patients). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:178 / 183
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]
Bone density and shape as determinants of bone strength in IGF-I and/or pamidronate-treated ovariectomized rats [J].
Ammann, P ;
Rizzoli, R ;
Meyer, JM ;
Bonjour, JP .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 6 (03) :219-227
[2]
[Anonymous], 1979, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT RE
[3]
[Anonymous], WHO 1998
[4]
COMPARISON OF BONE-MINERAL DENSITY IN BOTH HIPS [J].
BALSEIRO, J ;
FAHEY, FH ;
ZIESSMAN, HA .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (01) :151-153
[5]
BOBYN JD, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P79
[6]
A QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION OF PERIPROSTHETIC BONE-REMODELING AFTER CEMENTLESS TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY [J].
ENGH, CA ;
MCGOVERN, TF ;
BOBYN, JD ;
HARRIS, WH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1992, 74A (07) :1009-1020
[7]
ENGH CA, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V231, P7
[8]
Patient-related risk factors for early revision of total hip replacements - A population register-based case-control study of 674 revised hips [J].
Espehaug, B ;
Havelin, LI ;
Engesaeter, LB ;
Langeland, N ;
Vollset, SE .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1997, 68 (03) :207-215
[9]
NONINVASIVE MEASUREMENTS OF BONE MASS, STRUCTURE, AND STRENGTH - CURRENT METHODS AND EXPERIMENTAL-TECHNIQUES [J].
FAULKNER, KG ;
GLUER, CC ;
MAJUMDAR, S ;
LANG, P ;
ENGELKE, K ;
GENANT, HK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1991, 157 (06) :1229-1237
[10]
Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements - A review of 53 698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-99 [J].
Furnes, O ;
Lie, SA ;
Espehaug, B ;
Vollset, SE ;
Engesaeter, LB ;
Havelin, LI .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2001, 83B (04) :579-586