What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas?: a theoretical overview

被引:166
作者
Blackmore, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Fac Technol, Open Syst Res Grp, Dept Syst, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, Bucks, England
关键词
social learning; learning theories; discourse resource dilemmas; sustainable development;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2007.02.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper considers what kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas in the context of sustainable development. It also explains why and how the SLIM project focused on social learning for managing water resources. The range of learning theories that informed SLIM are discussed, as is the historical pattern of lineages, relationships and discontinuities among these and other theories. Whilst conceptions of social learning are contested, most perspectives raise questions about the nature of knowledge and knowing. It is argued that becoming aware of our assumptions regarding learning, knowing and how we develop knowledge, can help us find out more about what we need to know. The nature of resource dilemmas, implications for learning, what learning involves, its interdisciplinary nature and its history of ideas are all considered. An overview of learning theories is given, explaining their potential relevance for researchers, policyrnakers and practitioners in environmental contexts. The discourse, theory and practice of social learning and factors that influenced the choice of social learning theories by SLIM researchers are discussed. The paper concludes by considering how understanding what social learning involves can contribute, in a practical way, to dealing with resource dilemmas. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 525
页数:14
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ADULT ED SOCIAL RESP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Cow up a tree: Knowing and Learning for Change in Agriculture
[3]  
Case Studies from Industrialised Countries
[4]  
[Anonymous], ENV ED RES
[5]  
Argyris C., 1974, THEORY PRACTICE INCR
[6]  
Bandura A., 1986, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[7]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
[8]  
Bandura A., 1963, SOCIAL LEARNING PERS
[9]  
Bateson Gregory., 1972, Steps to an Ecology of Mind
[10]  
Beck Ulrich., 1992, RISK SOC