Responses of Glossina morsitans morsitans to blends of electroantennographically active compounds in the odors of its preferred (buffalo and ox) and nonpreferred (waterbuck) hosts

被引:58
作者
Gikonyo, NK [1 ]
Hassanali, A [1 ]
Njagi, PGN [1 ]
Saini, RK [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Ctr Insect Physiol & Ecol, Nairobi, Kenya
关键词
Glossina morsitans morsitans; tsetse fly; buffalo; ox; waterbuck; behavior; wind tunnel; host preferences; repellents; attractants; allomones;
D O I
10.1023/A:1026230615877
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In a previous study, comparison of the behavior of teneral Glossina morsitans morsitans on waterbuck, Kobus defassa ( a refractory host), and on two preferred hosts, buffalo, Syncerus caffer, and ox, Bos indicus, suggested the presence of allomones in the waterbuck odor. Examination of the volatile odors by coupled gas chromatography - electroantennographic detection showed that the antennal receptors of the flies detected constituents common to the three bovids (phenols and aldehydes), as well as a series of compounds specific to waterbuck, including C-8 - C-13 methyl ketones, delta-octalactone, and phenols. In this study, behavioral respones of teneral G. m. morsitans to different blends of these compounds were evaluated in a choice wind tunnel. The flies' responses to known or putative attractant blends ( the latter comprising EAG-active constituents common to all three animals and those common to buffalo and ox, excluding the known tseste attractants, 4-methylphenol and 3-n-propylphenol), and to putative repellent ( the blend of EAG-active compounds specific to the waterbuck volatiles), were different. A major difference related to their initial and final behaviors. When a choice of attractant blends ( known or putative) and clean air was presented, flies initially responded by flying upwind toward the odor source, but later moved downwind and rested on either side of the tunnel, with some preference for the side with the odor treatments. However, when presented with a choice of waterbuck-specific blend ( putative repellent) and clean air, the flies' initial reaction appeared random; flies flew upwind on either side, but eventually settled down on the odorless side of the tunnel. Flies that flew up the odor plume showed an aversion behavior to the blend. The results lend further support to previous indications for the existence of a tsetse repellent blend in waterbuck body odor and additional attractive constituents in buffalo and ox body odors.
引用
收藏
页码:2331 / 2345
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Effect of defensive behaviour by cattle on the feeding success and nutritional state of the tsetse fly, Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae) [J].
Baylis, M .
BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1996, 86 (04) :329-336
[2]   HUNGER IN TSETSE-FLY - NUTRITIONAL CORRELATES OF BEHAVIOR [J].
BRADY, J .
JOURNAL OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY, 1975, 21 (04) :807-829
[3]   ODOR PLUME SHAPE AND HOST FINDING BY TSETSE [J].
BRADY, J ;
PACKER, MJ ;
GIBSON, G .
INSECT SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATION, 1990, 11 (03) :377-384
[4]   DEVELOPMENT OF A LOW-COST TSETSE TRAP AND ODOR BAITS FOR GLOSSINA-PALLIDIPES AND G-LONGIPENNIS IN KENYA [J].
BRIGHTWELL, R ;
DRANSFIELD, RD ;
KYORKU, C .
MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY, 1991, 5 (02) :153-164
[5]   EFFECTS OF HOST ODOR ON THE BEHAVIOR OF TSETSE [J].
BURSELL, E .
INSECT SCIENCE AND ITS APPLICATION, 1984, 5 (05) :345-349
[6]   IDENTIFICATION OF COMPONENTS OF CATTLE URINE ATTRACTIVE TO TSETSE FLIES, GLOSSINA SPP (DIPTERA, GLOSSINIDAE) [J].
BURSELL, E ;
GOUGH, AJE ;
BEEVOR, PS ;
CORK, A ;
HALL, DR ;
VALE, GA .
BULLETIN OF ENTOMOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1988, 78 (02) :281-291
[8]  
CHORLEY T. W., 1948, PROC ROY ENT SOC LONDON SER A, V23, P9
[9]  
Clausen PH, 1998, MED VET ENTOMOL, V12, P169, DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2915.1998.00097.x
[10]   VISUALLY-GUIDED, UPWIND TURNING BEHAVIOR OF FREE-FLYING TSETSE FLIES IN ODOR-LADEN WIND - A WIND-TUNNEL STUDY [J].
COLVIN, J ;
BRADY, J ;
GIBSON, G .
PHYSIOLOGICAL ENTOMOLOGY, 1989, 14 (01) :31-39