The Levels of Evidence in Pediatric Orthopaedic Journals: Where Are We Now?

被引:29
作者
Cashin, Megan S. [1 ]
Kelley, Simon P. [1 ]
Douziech, Jeffery R. [2 ]
Varghese, Renjit A. [1 ]
Hamilton, Quinn P. [1 ]
Mulpuri, Kishore [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Childrens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
[2] British Columbia Childrens Hosp, Off Pediat Surg Evaluat & Innovat, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Orthopaed, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; JOINT-SURGERY; CLINICAL-TRIALS; AMERICAN VOLUME; QUALITY; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BPO.0b013e31822aa11a
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Background: In recent years, it has become common to publish a level of evidence grading for orthopaedic journal publications. Our primary research question is: is there an improvement in levels of evidence of articles published in pediatric orthopaedic journals over time? In addition, what is the current status of levels of evidence in pediatric orthopaedic journals? Methods: All articles in Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-A (JPO-A) and Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-B (JPO-B) for 2001, 2002, 2007, and 2008 and those in Journal of Children's Orthopaedics (JCO) for 2007 and 2008, were collected by an independent reviewer. Of the 1039 articles identified, animal, cadaveric and basic science studies, expert opinion and review articles were excluded. Seven hundred fifty remaining articles were blinded and randomized with respect to journal, title, publication date, author, and institution. According to the currently accepted grading system, study type and level of evidence was assigned to each article. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability were investigated. Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS software. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in study type or levels of evidence in articles published before and after 2003. Of articles published during 2007/2008, 3.0% were graded as level I, 5.0% as level II, 24.1% as level III, and 58.0% as level IV. Analysis of the separate journals for all 4 years revealed that JPO-A published 2.6% (13 of 503) level I studies, whereas JPO-B published 4.3% (7 of 163) and JCO published 1.2% (1 of 84). The intraobserver reliability was high for study type (kappa, 0.842) and substantial for level of evidence (kappa, 0.613). The interobserver reliability for study type and level of evidence was high (kappa 0.921 and 0.860, respectively). Conclusions: Since the introduction of levels of evidence to orthopaedic journals in 2003, there has been minimal change in the quality of evidence in pediatric orthopaedic publications. We note a modest increase in level III articles and a corresponding decrease in level IV articles. Articles can be reliably graded by nonepidemiologically trained individuals. Level of Evidence: Not applicable.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 725
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1996, 74 (04) :311-311
[2]
[Anonymous], 2009, EVID BASED MED
[3]
Interobserver agreement in the application of levels of evidence to scientific papers in The American Volume of The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Swiontkowski, MF ;
Einhorn, TA ;
Tornetta, P ;
Schemitsch, EH ;
Leece, P ;
Sprague, S ;
Wright, JG .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (08) :1717-1720
[4]
The quality of reporting of randomized trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000 [J].
Bhandari, M ;
Richards, RR ;
Sprague, S ;
Schemitsch, EH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (03) :388-396
[5]
Part I. Methodologic issues in the design of orthopaedic studies - Hierarchy of evidence: From case reports to randomized controlled trials [J].
Brighton, B ;
Bhandari, M ;
Tornetta, P ;
Felson, DT .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2003, (413) :19-24
[6]
Randomized controlled trials in pediatric surgery: Could we do better? [J].
Curry, JI ;
Reeves, B ;
Stringer, MD .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2003, 38 (04) :556-559
[7]
A quality assessment of randomized clinical trials in pediatric orthopedics [J].
Dulai, Sukhdeep K. ;
Slobogean, Bronwyn L. T. ;
Beauchamp, Richard D. ;
Mulpuri, Kishore .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ORTHOPAEDICS, 2007, 27 (05) :573-581
[8]
Levels of Evidence in Research Published in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) Over the Last Thirty Years [J].
Hanzlik, Shane ;
Mahabir, Raman C. ;
Baynosa, Richard C. ;
Khiabani, Kayvan T. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2009, 91A (02) :425-428
[9]
MEASUREMENT OF OBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR CATEGORICAL DATA [J].
LANDIS, JR ;
KOCH, GG .
BIOMETRICS, 1977, 33 (01) :159-174
[10]
The role of prospective randomized clinical trials in pediatric surgery: State of the art? [J].
Moss, RL ;
Henry, MCW ;
Dimmitt, RA ;
Rangel, S ;
Geraghty, N ;
Skarsgard, ED .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2001, 36 (08) :1182-1186