The influence of anesthetic choice, Paco2, and other factors on osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption in rats with brain tumor xenografts

被引:64
作者
Remsen, LG
Pagel, MA
McCormick, CI
Fiamengo, SA
Sexton, G
Neuwelt, EA
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Neurol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Surg, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[4] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Prevent Med & Publ Hlth, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[5] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[6] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Portland, OR USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199903000-00018
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Increasing the delivery of therapeutic drugs to the brain improves outcome for patients with brain tumors. Osmotic opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) can markedly increase drug delivery, but achieving consistent, good quality BBB disruption (BBBD) is essential. We evaluated four experiments compared with our standard isoflurane/O-2 protocol to improve the quality and consistency of BBBD and drug delivery to brain tumor and normal brain in a rat model. Success of BBBD was assessed qualitatively with the large molecular weight marker Evans blue albumin and quantitatively by measuring delivery of the low molecular weight marker [H-3]-methotrexate. With isoflurane/O-2 anesthesia, the effects of two BBBD drugs of different osmolalities were evaluated at two different infusion rates and infusion durations. Arabinose was superior to saline (P = 0.006) in obtaining consistent Evans blue staining in 16 of 24 animals, and it significantly increased [H-3]-methotrexate delivery compared with saline in the tumor (0.388 +/- 0.03 vs 0.135 +/- 0.04; P = 0.0001), brain around the tumor (0.269 +/- 0.03 vs 0.035 + 0.03; P = 0.0001), brain distant to the tumor (0.445 +/- 0.05 vs 0.034 +/- 0.07; P = 0.001), and opposite hemisphere (0.024 +/- 0.00 vs 0.016 +/- 0.00; P = 0.0452). Forty seconds was better than 30 s (P = 0.0372) for drug delivery to the tumor. Under isoflurane/O-2 anesthesia (n = 30), maintaining hypocarbia was better than hypercarbia (P = 0.025) for attaining good BBBD. A propofol/N2O regimen was compared with the isoflurane/O-2 regimen, altering blood pressure, heart rate, and PaCO2 as covariates (n = 48). Propofol/N2O was superior to isoflurane/O-2 by both qualitative and quantitative measures (P < 0.0001). Neurotoxicity and neuropathology with the propofol/N2O regimen was evaluated, and none was found. These data support the use of propofol/N2O along with maintaining hypocarbia to optimize BBBD in animals with tumors. Implications: Propofol/N2O anesthesia may be better than isoflurane/O-2 for optimizing osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption for delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs to brain tumor and normal brain.
引用
收藏
页码:559 / 567
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   ISOFLURANE AND CEREBROSPINAL-FLUID PRESSURE IN NEUROSURGICAL PATIENTS [J].
ADAMS, RW ;
CUCCHIARA, RF ;
GRONERT, GA ;
MESSICK, JM ;
MICHENFELDER, JD .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1981, 54 (02) :97-99
[2]   INTRAOPERATIVE MEASUREMENT OF CEREBRAL AND TUMOR BLOOD-FLOW WITH LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY [J].
ARBIT, E ;
DIRESTA, GR ;
BEDFORD, RF ;
SHAH, NK ;
GALICICH, JH .
NEUROSURGERY, 1989, 24 (02) :166-170
[3]  
BARNETT PA, 1995, AM J PATHOL, V146, P436
[4]  
Barth RF, 1997, CANCER RES, V57, P1129
[5]   Interstitial fluid pressure in intracranial tumours in patients and in rodents [J].
Boucher, Y ;
Salehi, H ;
Witwer, B ;
Harsh, GR ;
Jain, RK .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 75 (06) :829-836
[6]  
BOUCHER Y, 1992, CANCER RES, V52, P5110
[7]  
Boucher Y, 1996, CANCER RES, V56, P4264
[8]  
BRADBURY M, 1979, CONCEPT BLOOD BRAIN, P352
[9]  
Dahlborg S A, 1996, Cancer J Sci Am, V2, P166
[10]  
Dahlborg SA, 1998, CANCER J, V4, P110