A high-sensitivity alternative to "routine" genetic amniocentesis: Multiple urinary analytes, nuchal thickness, and age

被引:11
作者
Bahado-Singh, R [1 ]
Kovanci, E [1 ]
Cermik, D [1 ]
Copel, J [1 ]
Mahoney, MJ [1 ]
Cole, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
beta-core fragment; total estriol; ultrasonography;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70170-5
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the Down syndrome screening efficiency of a new algorithm consisting of multiple urinary biochemical and ultrasound markers for use in high-risk groups such as women of advanced maternal age. STUDY DESIGN: The urinary beta-core fragment of human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-core fragment) and total urinary estriol, along with fetal nuchal thickness, were measured prospectively in pregnant women who were undergoing genetic amniocentesis at midtrimester (15 to 24 weeks). The most common indication for amniocentesis was advanced maternal age (90.2%). An analyte ratio (beta-core fragment/total estriol ratio) was developed. The values were expressed as multiples of the normal median. An increase in the observed nuchal thickness (delta nuchal thickness) above that expected on the basis of the biparietal diameter was calculated. On the basis of the mean and standard deviations of the urinary analyte ratio in normal fetuses and also Down syndrome, we calculated individual Down syndrome likelihood ratios for each of the two parameters, using gaussian analysis. The product of the likelihood ratios, based on delta nuchal thickness and urinary beta-core fragment-total estriol Values times the maternal age-related risk, gave the overall Down syndrome risk. The screening efficiency of our algorithm at various risk thresholds was determined. RESULTS: There were 13 (2.8%) cases of Down syndrome in a total study population of 457. At a risk threshold of >1 in 70, the sensitivity was 92.3% for a false-positive rate of 4.5%. Corresponding values at a risk threshold of >1 in 78 were a sensitivity of 100% with a false-positive rate of 5.2%. CONCLUSION: By combining urinary analyte, nuchal thickness, and maternal age data, we achieved a high Down syndrome detection rate with a low false-positive rate. This algorithm would be attractive as an alternative to "routine" amniocentesis based solely on advanced maternal age. The potential benefits of this protocol could include a significant reduction in the rate of amniocentesis, along with substantial savings in medical expenditures.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 173
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   A new screening protocol combining urine β-core fragment and ultrasonography for Down syndrome detection [J].
Bahado-Singh, RO ;
Oz, UA ;
Deren, O ;
Acuna, E ;
Cermik, D ;
Mahoney, MJ ;
Cole, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 178 (04) :779-782
[2]   NORMAL NUCHAL THICKNESS IN THE MIDTRIMESTER INDICATES REDUCED RISK OF DOWN-SYNDROME IN PREGNANCIES WITH ABNORMAL TRIPLE-SCREEN RESULTS [J].
BAHADOSINGH, RO ;
GOLDSTEIN, I ;
UERPAIROJKIT, B ;
COPEL, JA ;
MAHONEY, MJ ;
BAUMGARTEN, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 173 (04) :1106-1110
[3]   A SONOGRAPHIC SIGN FOR THE DETECTION IN THE 2ND TRIMESTER OF THE FETUS WITH DOWNS-SYNDROME [J].
BENACERRAF, BR ;
BARSS, VA ;
LABODA, LA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1985, 151 (08) :1078-1079
[4]   The second-trimester fetus with Down syndrome: Detection using sonographic features [J].
Benacerraf, BR .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 7 (02) :147-155
[5]  
CANICK JA, 1995, PRENAT DIAGN, V15, P752
[6]  
Cole LA, 1997, PRENATAL DIAG, V17, P607, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199707)17:7<607::AID-PD118>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-7
[8]  
Cole LA, 1997, PRENATAL DIAG, V17, P1125
[9]   ESTIMATING A WOMANS RISK OF HAVING A PREGNANCY ASSOCIATED WITH DOWNS-SYNDROME USING HER AGE AND SERUM ALPHA-FETOPROTEIN LEVEL [J].
CUCKLE, HS ;
WALD, NJ ;
THOMPSON, SG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1987, 94 (05) :387-402
[10]   URINARY MULTIPLE MARKER SCREENING FOR DOWNS-SYNDROME [J].
CUCKLE, HS ;
ILES, RK ;
SEHMI, IK ;
CHARD, T ;
OAKEY, RE ;
DAVIES, S ;
IND, T .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1995, 15 (08) :745-751