Simulation supplements field studies to determine no-till dryland corn population recommendations for semiarid western Nebraska

被引:51
作者
Lyon, DJ
Hammer, GL
McLean, GB
Blumenthal, JM
机构
[1] Panhandle Res & Ext Cent, Scottsbluff, NE 69361 USA
[2] QDPI, Agr Prod Syst Res Unit, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2003.0884
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In a 2-yr multiple-site field study conducted in western Nebraska during 1999 and 2000, optimum dryland corn (Zea mays L.) population varied from less than 1.7 to more than 5.6 plants m(-2), depending largely on available water resources. The objective of this study was to use a modeling approach to investigate corn population recommendations for a wide range of seasonal variation. A corn growth simulation model (APSIM-maize) was coupled to long-term sequences of historical climatic data from western Nebraska to provide probabilistic estimates of dryland yield for a range of corn populations. Simulated populations ranged from 2 to 5 plants m(-2). Simulations began with one of three levels of available soil water at planting, either 80, 160, or 240 mm in the surface 1.5 m of a loam soil. Gross margins were maximized at 3 plants m(-2) when starting available water was 160 or 240 mm, and the expected probability of a financial loss at this population was reduced from about 10% at 160 mm to 0% at 240 mm. When starting available water was 80 mm, average gross margins were less than $15 ha(-1), and risk of financial loss exceeded 40%. Median yields were greatest when starting available soil water was 240 mm. However, perhaps the greater benefit of additional soil water at planting was reduction in the risk of making a financial loss. Dryland corn growers in western Nebraska are advised to use a population of 3 plants m(-2) as a base recommendation.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 891
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Simulation of a legume ley farming system in northern Australia using the Agricultural Production Systems Simulator [J].
Carberry, PS ;
McCown, RL ;
Muchow, RC ;
Dimes, JP ;
Probert, ME ;
Dalgliesh, NP .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1996, 36 (08) :1037-1048
[2]  
*CINRS GROUP, 2003, SEAS CLIM OUTL
[3]   Cropping systems to control winter annual grasses in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) [J].
Daugovish, O ;
Lyon, DJ ;
Baltensperger, DD .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 13 (01) :120-126
[4]   Economics of dryland cropping systems in the great plains: A review [J].
Dhuyvetter, KC ;
Thompson, CR ;
Norwood, CA ;
Halvorson, AD .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1996, 9 (02) :216-222
[5]   RadEst3.00: software to estimate daily radiation data from commonly available meteorological variables [J].
Donatelli, M ;
Bellocchi, G ;
Fontana, F .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2003, 18 (3-4) :363-367
[6]   Soil water storage in dryland cropping systems: The significance of cropping intensification [J].
Farahani, HJ ;
Peterson, GA ;
Westfall, DG ;
Sherrod, LA ;
Ahuja, LR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1998, 62 (04) :984-991
[7]   The value of skill in seasonal climate forecasting to wheat crop management in a region with high climatic variability [J].
Hammer, GL ;
Holzworth, DP ;
Stone, R .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1996, 47 (05) :717-737
[8]  
HAMMER GL, 1996, OCCASIONAL PUBLICATI, V93, P43
[9]  
HAVLIN JL, 1988, CHALLENGES DRYLAND A, P837
[10]  
Hu Q, 1998, B AM METEOROL SOC, V79, P221, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1998)079<0221:IVOAPI>2.0.CO