Plantar pressure in off-loading devices used in diabetic ulcer treatment

被引:39
作者
Beuker, BJ
Van Deursen, RW
Price, P
Manning, EA
Van Baal, JG
Harding, KG
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Healthcare Studies, Res Ctr Clin Kinaesiol, Cardiff CF14 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[2] Cardiff Univ, Wound Healing Res Unit, Cardiff CF14 4XN, S Glam, Wales
[3] Twenteborg Hosp, Dept Surg, Diabet Foot Unit, Almelo, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-475X.2005.00075.x
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Four off-loading devices used for the treatment of diabetic forefoot ulcers were compared: a custom-molded insole shoe, a cast MABAL shoe, a prefabricated pneumatic walking brace, and a bivalved total contact cast (BTCC). It was anticipated that all devices would significantly reduce forefoot plantar pressure compared with a control shoe. Sixteen healthy volunteers participated. Plantar pressures were evaluated using the Pedar system, while walking speed was determined using an optoelectric timer. Peak pressure (PP) of ten plantar areas and pressure-time integral for the first metatarsal area were analyzed statistically using a repeated measures analysis of variance. Forefoot pressures were significantly reduced compared with the control shoe for all devices (p<0.001). PP was most reduced (by 65.8%) for the BTCC, and pressure-time integral was most reduced for the BTCC and cast MABAL shoe. Small but significant differences between devices in walking speed (p<0.05) could not explain the substantial PP differences between the different devices. Although all off-loading devices resulted in a significant reduction of forefoot plantar pressure, devices differed significantly in the magnitude of pressure reduction. Further research will have to reveal the level of off-loading sufficient for effective treatment of diabetic ulcers.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 542
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] A comparison study of plantar foot pressure in a standardized shoe, total contact cast, and prefabricated pneumatic walking brace
    Baumhauer, JF
    Wervey, R
    McWilliams, J
    Harris, GF
    Shereff, MJ
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 18 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [2] BUS SA, 2000, P 24 ANN M AM SOC BI, P237
  • [3] ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF FOOT DISEASE IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES
    CAPUTO, GM
    CAVANAGH, PR
    ULBRECHT, JS
    GIBBONS, GW
    KARCHMER, AW
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 331 (13) : 854 - 860
  • [4] Biomechanical aspects of diabetic foot disease: Aetiology, treatment, and prevention
    Cavanagh, PR
    Ulbrecht, JS
    Caputo, GM
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 1996, 13 : S17 - S22
  • [5] PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION UNDER SYMPTOM-FREE FEET DURING BAREFOOT STANDING
    CAVANAGH, PR
    RODGERS, MM
    IIBOSHI, A
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE, 1987, 7 (05): : 262 - 276
  • [6] Comparison of strategies for reducing pressure at the site of neuropathic ulcers
    Fleischli, JG
    Lavery, LA
    Vela, SA
    Ashry, H
    Lavery, DC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PODIATRIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 87 (10): : 466 - 472
  • [7] The MABAL shoe, an alternative method in contact casting for the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers
    Hissink, RJ
    Manning, HA
    van Baal, JG
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 21 (04) : 320 - 323
  • [8] Jacobs TS, 2000, WOUNDS, V12, P96
  • [9] Reliability of an in-shoe pressure measurement system during treadmill walking
    Kernozek, TW
    LaMott, EE
    Dancisak, MJ
    [J]. FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 17 (04) : 204 - 209
  • [10] Total contact casts: Pressure reduction at ulcer sites and the effect on the contralateral foot
    Lavery, LA
    Vela, SA
    Lavery, DC
    Quebedeaux, TL
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1997, 78 (11): : 1268 - 1271