Radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging alone

被引:183
作者
Lee, YK
Bollet, M
Charles-Edwards, G
Flower, MA
Leach, MO
McNair, H
Moore, E
Rowbottom, C
Webb, S
机构
[1] Canc Res Inst, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[3] Canc Res Inst, Acad Unit Radiotherapy & Oncol, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[4] Canc Res Inst, CRC, Clin Magnet Resonance Res Grp, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[5] Canc Res Inst, Dept Radiotherapy, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[6] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, N Western Med Phys, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
radiotherapy treatment planning; prostate cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; conformal radiotherapy; electron-density bulk-assignment;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(02)00440-1
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Accurate anatomical delineation of the gross tumour volume (GTV) is crucial for effective radiotherapy (RT) treatment of prostate cancers. Although reference to pelvic magnetic resonance (MR) for improved delineation of the prostate is a regular practice in some clinics, MR has not replaced CT due to its geometrical distortions and lack of electron-density information. The possibility and practicality of using MR only for RT treatment planning were studied. Materials and methods: The addition of electron-density information to MR images for conformal radiotherapy (CRT) planning of the prostate was quantified by comparing dose distributions created on the homogeneous density- and bulk-density assigned images to original CT for four patients. To quantify the MR geometrical distortions measurements of a phantom imaged in CT (Siemens Somatom Plus 4) and FLASH 3D T1-weighted MR (1.5 T whole body Siemens Magnetom Vision) were compared. Dose statistics from CRT treatment plans made on CT and MR for five patient data were compared to determine if MR-only treatment plans can be made. Results: The differences between dose-plans on bulk-density assigned images when compared to CT were less than 2% when water and bone values were assigned. Dose differences greater than 2% were observed when images of homogeneous-density assignment were compared to the CT. Phantom measurements showed that the distortions in the FLASH 3D T1-weighted MR averaged 2 mm in the volume of interest for prostate RT planning. For the CT and MR prostate planning study, doses delivered to the planning target volume (PTV) in CT and MR were always inside a 93-107% dose range normalised to the isocentre. Also, the doses to the organs-at-risk in the MR images were similar to the doses delivered to the volumes in the registered CT image when the organ volumes between the two images were similar. Conclusions: Negligible differences were observed in dose distribution between CRT plans using bone + water CT number bulk-assigned image and original CT. Also, the MR distortions were reduced to negligible amounts using large bandwidth MR sequence for prostate CRT planning. MR treatment planning was demonstrated using a large bandwidth sequence and bulk-assigned images. The development of higher quality, low distortion MR sequence will allow regular practice of this technique. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 216
页数:14
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Radiotherapy treatment planning of brain tumours using MRI alone [J].
Beavis, AW ;
Gibbs, P ;
Dealey, RA ;
Whitton, VJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1998, 71 (845) :544-548
[2]   DECOMPOSITION OF PENCIL BEAM KERNELS FOR FAST DOSE CALCULATIONS IN 3-DIMENSIONAL TREATMENT PLANNING [J].
BORTFELD, T ;
SCHLEGEL, W ;
RHEIN, B .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (02) :311-318
[3]  
*CANC RES CAMP, 2002, SCI YB 2000 2002
[4]   The contribution of magnetic resonance imaging to the three-dimensional treatment planning of localized prostate cancer [J].
Debois, M ;
Oyen, R ;
Maes, F ;
Verswijvel, G ;
Gatti, G ;
Bosmans, H ;
Feron, M ;
Bellon, E ;
Kutcher, G ;
Van Poppel, H ;
Vanuytsel, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 45 (04) :857-865
[5]  
*EUCAN, 1996, CANC INC MORT PREV E
[6]   Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning [J].
Fiorino, C ;
Reni, M ;
Bolognesi, A ;
Cattaneo, GM ;
Calandrino, R .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 47 (03) :285-292
[7]   FRACTIONATED STEREOTAXICALLY GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY OF HEAD AND NECK TUMORS - A REPORT ON CLINICAL USE OF A NEW SYSTEM IN 195 CASES [J].
GADEMANN, G ;
SCHLEGEL, W ;
DEBUS, J ;
SCHAD, L ;
BORTFELD, T ;
HOVER, KH ;
LORENZ, WJ ;
WANNENMACHER, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 29 (02) :205-213
[8]  
ICRU, 1992, ICRU Report, P46
[9]  
*ICRU, 1987, 42 ICRU
[10]   Comparison of MRI with CT for the radiotherapy planning of prostate cancer: a feasibility study [J].
Khoo, VS ;
Padhani, AR ;
Tanner, SF ;
Finnigan, DJ ;
Leach, MO ;
Dearnaley, DP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1999, 72 (858) :590-597