Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary

被引:443
作者
Norris, D
McQueen, JM
Cutler, A
机构
[1] MRC, Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England
[2] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, NL-6525 XD Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
computational modeling; feedback; lexical processing; modularity; phonemic decisions; reading; speech recognition; word recognition;
D O I
10.1017/S0140525X00003241
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Top-down feedback does not benefit speech recognition; on the contrary, it can hinder it. No experimental data imply that feedback loops are required for speech recognition. Feedback is accordingly unnecessary and spoken word recognition is modular. To defend this thesis, we analyse lexical involvement in phonemic decision making. TRACE (McClelland & Elman 1986), a model with feedback from the lexicon to prelexical processes, is unable to account for all the available data on phonemic decision making. The modular Race model (Cutler & Norris 1979) is likewise challenged by some recent results, however. We therefore present a new modular model of phonemic decision making, the Merge model. In Merge, information flows from prelexical processes to the lexicon without feedback. Because phonemic decisions are based on the merging of prelexical and lexical information, Merge correctly predicts lexical involvement in phonemic decisions in both words and nonwords. Computer simulations show how Merge is able to account for the data through a process of competition between lexical hypotheses. We discuss the issue of feedback in other areas of language processing and conclude that modular models are particularly well suited to the problems and constraints of speech recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / +
页数:35
相关论文
共 122 条
[1]   EXPECTANCY AS A DETERMINANT OF FUNCTIONAL UNITS IN PERCEPTUAL RECOGNITION [J].
ADERMAN, D ;
SMITH, EE .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 2 (01) :117-129
[2]   INTERACTION WITH CONTEXT DURING HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING [J].
ALTMANN, G ;
STEEDMAN, M .
COGNITION, 1988, 30 (03) :191-238
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, ATTENTION PERFORMANC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PERCEIVING TALKING F
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1985, NATURAL LANGUAGE PAR, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511597855
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1979, COMPREHENDING SENTEN
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1986, NUMERICAL RECIPES C
[8]   SEMANTIC CONTEXT EFFECTS IN VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION - AN ANALYSIS OF SEMANTIC STRATEGIES [J].
BECKER, CA .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1980, 8 (06) :493-512
[9]   The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension [J].
Boland, JE .
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1997, 12 (04) :423-484
[10]   Interaction with autonomy: Multiple Output models and the inadequacy of the Great Divide [J].
Boland, JE ;
Cutler, A .
COGNITION, 1996, 58 (03) :309-320