Physician scores on a national clinical skills examination as predictors of complaints to medical regulatory authorities

被引:293
作者
Tamblyn, Robyn
Abrahamowicz, Michal
Dauphinee, Dale
Wenghofer, Elizabeth
Jacques, Andre
Klass, Daniel
Smee, Sydney
Blackmore, David
Winslade, Nancy
Girard, Nadyne
Du Berger, Roxane
Bartman, Ilona
Buckeridge, David L.
Hanley, James A.
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A3, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Montreal, PQ H3A 1A3, Canada
[3] Ontario Coll Phys & Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Quebec Coll Phys, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Med Council Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2007年 / 298卷 / 09期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.298.9.993
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Poor patient-physician communication increases the risk of patient complaints and malpractice claims. To address this problem, licensure assessment has been reformed in Canada and the United States, including a national standardized assessment of patient-physician communication and clinical history taking and examination skills. Objective To assess whether patient-physician communication examination scores in the clinical skills examination predicted future complaints in medical practice. Design, Setting, and Participants Cohort study of all 3424 physicians taking the Medical Council of Canada clinical skills examination between 1993 and 1996 who were licensed to practice in Ontario and/or Quebec. Participants were followed up until 2005, including the first 2 to 12 years of practice. Main Outcome Measure Patient complaints against study physicians that were filed with medical regulatory authorities in Ontario or Quebec and retained after investigation. Multivariate Poisson regression was used to estimate the relationship between complaint rate and scores on the clinical skills examination and traditional written examination. Scores are based on a standardized mean (SD) of 500 ( 100). Results Overall, 1116 complaints were filed for 3424 physicians, and 696 complaints were retained after investigation. Of the physicians, 17.1% had at least 1 retained complaint, of which 81.9% were for communication or quality-of-care problems. Patient-physician communication scores for study physicians ranged from 31 to 723 ( mean [ SD], 510.9 [91.1]). A 2-SD decrease in communication score was associated with 1.17 more retained complaints per 100 physicians per year ( relative risk [RR], 1.38; 95% confidence interval [Cl], 1.18-1.61) and 1.20 more communication complaints per 100 practice-years ( RR, 1.43; 95% Cl, 1.15-1.77). After adjusting for the predictive ability of the clinical decision-making score in the traditional written examination, the patient-physician communication score in the clinical skills examination remained significantly predictive of retained complaints ( likelihood ratio test, P <. 001), with scores in the bottom quartile explaining an additional 9.2% ( 95% Cl, 4.7%-13.1%) of complaints. Conclusion Scores achieved in patient-physician communication and clinical decision making on a national licensing examination predicted complaints to medical regulatory authorities.
引用
收藏
页码:993 / 1001
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
*AAMC, 2006, 3 AAMC, P1
[2]  
BALDWIN LM, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V78, P1050
[3]   THE DOCTOR-PATIENT-RELATIONSHIP AND MALPRACTICE - LESSONS FROM PLAINTIFF DEPOSITIONS [J].
BECKMAN, HB ;
MARKAKIS, KM ;
SUCHMAN, AL ;
FRANKEL, RM .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 154 (12) :1365-1370
[4]  
Ben-David MF, 1999, MED EDUC, V33, P439
[5]  
Bogdonoff MD, 2004, NEW ENGL J MED, V351, P507
[6]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHYSICIANS MALPRACTICE CLAIMS HISTORY AND LATER CLAIMS - DOES THE PAST PREDICT THE FUTURE [J].
BOVBJERG, RR ;
PETRONIS, KR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 272 (18) :1421-1426
[7]  
Cleary T, 1970, SOCIOL METHODOL, V2, P130
[8]   GMC and the future of revalidation - Self regulation must be made to work [J].
Dauphinee, WD .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7504) :1385-1387
[9]   A comparative study of measures to evaluate medical students' performances [J].
Edelstein, RA ;
Reid, HM ;
Usatine, R ;
Wilkes, MS .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (08) :825-833
[10]  
*FED STAT MED BOAR, 2006, EL MOD STAT MED BOAR