Protective or counter-productive? Labour market institutions and the effect of immigration on EU natives

被引:174
作者
Angrist, JD [1 ]
Kugler, AD
机构
[1] MIT, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] NBER, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1468-0297.00136
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Reduced labour market flexibility may protect some native workers from immigrant competition but can increase negative effects on equilibrium employment. This motivates an analysis of immigration effects interacted with institutions. OLS estimates for European countries show small, mostly negative immigration effects while an IV strategy based on immigrants front former Yugoslavia generates larger though mostly insignificant negative estimates. Specifications allowing interactions between immigration and measures of labour and product market rigidity are consistent with the view that reduced flexibility increases negative immigration effects. The estimates typically imply more native job losses in countries With restrictive institutions, especially restricted product markets.
引用
收藏
页码:F302 / F331
页数:30
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Consequences of employment protection? The case of the Americans with Disabilities Act [J].
Acemoglu, D ;
Angrist, JD .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2001, 109 (05) :915-957
[2]  
ALTONJI JG, 1991, IMMIGRATION TRADE LA
[3]  
ANGRIST J, 2001, NBER WORKING PAPER, V8660
[4]  
[Anonymous], 187 IZA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, HAS GLOBALIZATION GO
[6]  
Bauer T. K., 1999, 3 IZA, V3
[7]  
BENTOLILA S, 1990, REV ECON STUD, V57, P81
[8]  
BERTRAND M, 2001, NBER WORKING PAPER, V8211
[9]   The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of European unemployment: The aggregate evidence [J].
Blanchard, O ;
Wolfers, J .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2000, 110 (462) :C1-C33
[10]   THE ECONOMIC-BENEFITS FROM IMMIGRATION [J].
BORJAS, GJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 1995, 9 (02) :3-22