Cash versus services: 'Worlds of welfare' and the decommodification of cash benefits and health care services

被引:151
作者
Bambra, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Sheffield S10 2BP, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0047279404008542
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Welfare state models have focused almost exclusively on the study of cash benefits, and typologies established on this limited basis have been used to generalise about all forms of welfare state provision. This ignores the fact that welfare states are also about the actual delivery of services and/or that countries vary in terms of the relative emphasis that they place upon cash benefits and welfare state services. This article explores the cash and services mix in, and between, welfare states with reference to recent welfare state typologies, most notably Esping-Andersen's decommodification-centred 'worlds of welfare'. It compares the decommodification levels of the main cash benefits with the main area of service provision: health care. The resulting analysis suggests that when services are added into the comparative analysis of welfare state regimes there are five welfare state clusters: Social Democratic, Liberal, Conservative, and subgroups within both the Liberal and Conservative regimes. The article concludes that, in order to maintain integrity or generalisability, future welfare state typologies need to reflect more adequately the role of services in welfare state provision.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 213
页数:19
相关论文
共 57 条
[41]  
MORAN M, 1999, GOVT HEALTHC STAT CO
[42]  
Moran M, 2000, Brit J Pol Int Relat, P135, DOI [DOI 10.1111/1467-856X.00031, 10.1111/1467-856X.00031]
[43]  
OCONNOR JS, 1993, CURR SOCIOL, V44, P48
[44]  
*OECD, 2000, LAB FORC STAT PAR OE
[45]  
*OECD, 1995, PRIV PENS OECD COUNT
[46]  
*OECD, 1988, REF PUBL PENS PAR OE
[47]  
*OECD, 1997, PRIV PENS OECD COUNT
[48]  
*OECD, 1996, LAB MARK OLD WORK PA
[49]  
*OECD, 1995, EMPL OUTL PAR OECD