Inhibitory action of forearm flexor muscle afferents on corticospinal outputs to antagonist muscles in humans

被引:96
作者
Bertolasi, L
Priori, A
Tinazzi, M
Bertasi, V
Rothwell, JC
机构
[1] Univ Rome La Sapienza, Dipartimento Sci Neurol, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Verona, Dipartimento Sci Neurol & Vis, I-37100 Verona, Italy
[3] IRCCS, Ctr San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Brescia, Italy
[4] Inst Neurol, MRC, Human Movement & Balance Unit, London, England
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON | 1998年 / 511卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-7793.1998.947bg.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
1. To find out whether muscle afferents influence the excitability of corticospinal projections to antagonist muscles, we studied sixteen healthy subjects and one patient with a focal brain lesion. 2. Using transcranial magnetic and electrical brain stimulation we tested the excitability of corticomotoneuronal connections to right forearm muscles at rest after conditioning stimulation of the median nerve at the elbow. Somatosensory potentials evoked by median nerve stimulation were also recorded in each subject. 3. Test stimuli delivered at 13-19 ms after median nerve stimulation significantly inhibited EMG responses elicited in forearm extensor muscles by transcranial magnetic stimulation, but did not inhibit responses to electrical stimulation. In contrast, magnetically and electrically elicited responses in forearm flexor muscles were suppressed to the same extent. 4. The higher the intensity of the test shocks, the smaller was the amount of median nerve-elicited inhibition. Inhibition in extensor muscles was also smaller during tonic wrist extension, or if the induced electrical stimulating current in the brain flowed from posterior to anterior over the motor strip rather than vice versa. Test responses evoked by magnetic transcranial stimulation in the first dorsal interosseous and in brachioradialis muscles were not inhibited after median nerve stimulation at the elbow. Stimulation of digital nerves failed to inhibit motor potentials in extensor muscles. 5. Test stimuli delivered at 15 and 17 ms after radial nerve stimulation significantly inhibited EMG responses elicited in forearm flexor muscles by magnetic transcranial stimulation. 6. In the patient with a focal thalamic lesion, who had dystonic postures and an absent N20 component of the somatosensory-evoked potentials but normal strength, median nerve stimulation failed to inhibit magnetically evoked responses in forearm extensor muscles. 7. We propose that activation of median nerve muscle afferents can suppress the excitability of cortical areas controlling the antagonist forearm extensor muscles acting on the hand. The inhibitory effect occurs at short latency and might assist spinal pathways mediating reciprocal inhibition by contrasting the co-activation of antagonistic pools of corticospinal cells.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 956
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, CONTROL HUMAN VOLUNT
[2]   Afferent excitation of human motor cortex as revealed by enhancement of direct cortico-spinal actions on motoneurones [J].
Baldissera, F ;
Leocani, L .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 97 (06) :394-401
[3]   EVIDENCE FAVORING PRESYNAPTIC INHIBITION BETWEEN ANTAGONIST MUSCLE AFFERENTS IN THE HUMAN FOREARM [J].
BERARDELLI, A ;
DAY, BL ;
MARSDEN, CD ;
ROTHWELL, JC .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1987, 391 :71-83
[4]  
Bertrand L., 1996, Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, V22, P1083
[5]   CUTANEOUS REFLEXES IN SMALL MUSCLES OF HAND [J].
CACCIA, MR ;
MCCOMAS, AJ ;
UPTON, ARM ;
BLOGG, T .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1973, 36 (06) :960-977
[6]   MODULATION OF MOTOR-ACTIVITY BY CUTANEOUS INPUT - INHIBITION OF THE MAGNETIC MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIAL BY DIGITAL ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION [J].
CLOUSTON, PD ;
KIERS, L ;
MENKES, D ;
SANDER, H ;
CHIAPPA, K ;
CROS, D .
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND MOTOR CONTROL-ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1995, 97 (02) :114-125
[7]   TASK-DEPENDENT CHANGES IN THE SIZE OF RESPONSE TO MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION IN HUMAN 1ST DORSAL INTEROSSEOUS MUSCLE [J].
DATTA, AK ;
HARRISON, LM ;
STEPHENS, JA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1989, 418 :13-23
[8]   CHANGES IN THE RESPONSE TO MAGNETIC AND ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION OF THE MOTOR CORTEX FOLLOWING MUSCLE STRETCH IN MAN [J].
DAY, BL ;
RIESCHER, H ;
STRUPPLER, A ;
ROTHWELL, JC ;
MARSDEN, CD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1991, 433 :41-57
[9]   ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX - SURFACE EMG AND SINGLE MOTOR UNIT RESPONSES [J].
DAY, BL ;
DRESSLER, D ;
DENOORDHOUT, AM ;
MARSDEN, CD ;
NAKASHIMA, K ;
ROTHWELL, JC ;
THOMPSON, PD .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1989, 412 :449-473
[10]   FACILITATION OF MOTOR EVOKED-POTENTIALS BY SOMATOSENSORY AFFERENT STIMULATION [J].
DELETIS, V ;
SCHILD, JH ;
BERIC, A ;
DIMITRIJEVIC, MR .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 85 (05) :302-310