RETRACTED: Point-of-care (POC) measurement of coagulation after cardiac surgery (Retracted Article)

被引:22
作者
Boldt, J [1 ]
Walz, G [1 ]
Triem, J [1 ]
Suttner, S [1 ]
Kumle, B [1 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Stadt Ludwigshafen, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care Med, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany
关键词
surgery; cardiac; coagulation; point-of-care (POC); bleeding; costs; turn-around time; partial thromboplastin time; prothrombin time; Thrombolytic Assessment System (TAS) CoaguCheck Plus degrees;
D O I
10.1007/s001340050743
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective:Two different: point-of-care (POC) systems for the monitoring of coagulation variables at the bedside were evaluated with regard to practicability, accuracy and costs; Design: Prospective, descriptive study. Setting: Single-institutional, clinical investigation on an intensive care unit (ICU) of an urban, university-affiliated hospital. Patients: Eighty cardiac surgery patients were studied postoperatively. Interventions: Arterial blood samples were drawn postoperatively on the ICU at different data points. Measurements ann results: Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and prothrombin time (PT) were measured using two POC systems (Thrombolytic Assessment System [TAS] and CoaguCheck Plus(o)). At the same time coagulation parameters were measured by the central laboratory of the hospital. Measurements were carried out at different data points after cardiac surgery on the ICU. The direct and indirect costs of measuring aPTT/PT were also assessed. Bias analyses revealed good agreement of the POC-based monitoring of aPTT/PT with laboratory-based monitoring of coagulation (e.g. aPTT CoaguCheck: bias of - 2.8 s with +/- 2 SD [limits of agree ment] of + 13.7 and -19.1 s). Mean turn-around time (TAT; time from blood sampling until availability of data for the ICU physicians) was significantly longer for the central laboratory-based coagulation monitoring (130 +/- 38 min) than for the two POC systems (aPTT-TAS: 9.6 +/- 2.7 min; aPTT-CoaguCheck: 6.5 +/- 1.9 min). Blood sampling at unfavorable times increased the TAT for laboratory-based measurements considerably. The direct costs for measuring aPPT and PT were significantly higher using both POC systems (aPTT-TAS: $ 4.84; aPTT-CoaguCheck: $ 4.34) than for the central laboratory ($ 1.59). Costs for transportation increased the laboratory-based monitoring considerably ($ 3.77). Conclusions: Both POC analyzers may reduce the potential for preanalytical errors associated with coagulation measurements at the central laboratory, hasten TAT significantly and may improve patient therapy by reducing inappropriate administration of blood products.
引用
收藏
页码:1187 / 1193
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   BEDSIDE COAGULATION MONITORING [J].
AMMAR, T ;
REICH, DL .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 1995, 9 (04) :353-354
[2]   BEDSIDE COAGULATION MONITORING IN HEPARIN-TREATED PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE THROMBOEMBOLIC DISEASE - A CORONARY-CARE UNIT EXPERIENCE [J].
BECKER, RC ;
CYR, J ;
CORRAO, JM ;
BALL, SP .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1994, 128 (04) :719-723
[3]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[4]  
DECRESCE RP, 1995, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V119, P898
[5]   EFFECT OF HEPARIN ON WHOLE-BLOOD ACTIVATED PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME USING A PORTABLE, WHOLE-BLOOD COAGULATION MONITOR [J].
DESPOTIS, GJ ;
HOGUE, CW ;
SANTORO, SA ;
JOIST, JH ;
BARNES, PW ;
LAPPAS, DG .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1995, 23 (10) :1674-1679
[6]  
DESPOTIS GJ, 1994, J THORAC CARDIOV SUR, V107, P271
[7]   Factors associated with excessive postoperative blood loss and hemostatic transfusion requirements: A multivariate analysis in cardiac surgical patients [J].
Despotis, GJ ;
Filos, KS ;
Zoys, TN ;
Hogue, CW ;
Spitznagel, E ;
Lappas, DG .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (01) :13-21
[8]   APROTININ PROLONGS WHOLE-BLOOD ACTIVATED PARTIAL THROMBOPLASTIN TIME BUT NOT WHOLE-BLOOD PROTHROMBIN TIME IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CARDIAC-SURGERY [J].
DESPOTIS, GJ ;
ALSOUFIEV, A ;
GOODNOUGH, LT ;
LAPPAS, DG .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (05) :919-924
[9]  
ELLISON N, 1989, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPA, P99
[10]  
ERICKSON KA, 1993, CLIN CHEM, V39, P283