Fine-scale genetic structure in Pinus clausa (Pinaceae) populations:: effects of disturbance history

被引:83
作者
Parker, KC [1 ]
Hamrick, JL
Parker, AJ
Nason, JD
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Geog, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Bot, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Dept Genet, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Iowa State Univ, Dept Bot, Ames, IA 50011 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
disturbance history; gene dispersal; genetic structure; Pinus clausa; spatial autocorrelation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00914.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Spatial autocorrelation analyses of 12 allozyme loci were used to compare genetic structure within populations of two varieties of Pinus clausa. P. clausa var. immuginata populations tend to be uneven-aged, with continuous recruitment in small gaps created by wind damage, whereas P. clausa var. clausa populations are more even-aged, with recruitment postdating periodic canopy fires. Three var. immuginata populations and three matched pairs of var. clausa populations, including both a mature and a nearby recently burned population, were examined. Aggregation of multilocus genotypes at small distances was evident in all young var. clausa populations. Little inbreeding was apparent among juveniles or adults in these populations; their genetic structure is likely to have resulted from limited seed dispersal. Genotypes were not significantly spatially structured in nearby matched mature populations. Genetic structure was less evident in var. immuginata populations. Aggregated genotypes were only apparent in the population where patches included juveniles of similar ages; dense juvenile clumps in the other two var. immuginata populations comprised a variety of ages. Interannual variability in allele frequencies of surviving seedlings may account for the absence of genetic structure in these populations.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 113
页数:15
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
BARNETT JP, 1965, SO19 US FOR SERV RES
[2]  
BERG EE, 1995, EVOLUTION, V49, P110, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb05963.x
[3]   GENETIC-STRUCTURE OF BLACK SPRUCE ON 2 CONTRASTING SITES [J].
BOYLE, T ;
LIENGSIRI, C ;
PIEWLUANG, C .
HEREDITY, 1990, 65 :393-399
[4]  
CHELIAK WM, 1985, GENETICS, V109, P569
[5]  
COCKERHAM CC, 1969, EVOLUTION, V23, P72, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1969.tb03496.x
[6]  
COOPER RW, 1959, 30 USDA FOR SERV
[7]  
Ellstrand Norman C., 1992, New Forests, V6, P241, DOI 10.1007/BF00120647
[8]  
Epperson B. K., 1992, New Forests, V6, P257, DOI 10.1007/BF00120648
[9]  
EPPERSON BK, 1989, GENETICS, V121, P369
[10]  
Epperson BK, 1997, EVOLUTION, V51, P275, DOI 10.2307/2410981