Reactions of young adults to September 11, 2001

被引:44
作者
Ford, CA
Udry, JR
Gleiter, K
Chantala, K
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Adolescent Med Program, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Sch Med, Dept Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Carolina Populat Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE | 2003年 / 157卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpedi.157.6.572
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health provides opportunities to describe the reactions of young adults to September 11, 2001, and to increase understanding of the reactions among those who do not directly witness disasters. Objectives: To compare the feelings, perceptions, and behaviors of respondents interviewed before with those of respondents interviewed within 9 weeks after September 11; and to test the influence of time and distance from terrorist sites on pre-post comparisons. Design: Cross-sectional study, with comparison groups before and after September 11. Setting: In-home interviews Participants: Seven thousand ninety-five respondents aged 18 to 26 years. Main Outcome Measures: Sadness, psychological distress, closeness to parents, importance of religion and spirituality, trust in government, and substance use. Results: Male (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-1.65) and female (aOR, 1.44; 95% Cl, 1.22-1.71) respondents interviewed after September I I were more likely to report sadness and increased trust in government (aOR range, 2.11-3.30) than those interviewed before September 11. Proportions reporting sadness returned to baseline in 4 to 6 weeks; increased political trust persisted for the 9-week study period. Male respondents interviewed the second week afterwards were more likely to report religious faith (aOR, 2.06; 95% Cl, 1.40-3.00) and spiritual life (aOR, 1.75; 95% Cl, 1.18-2.60) as important than were those interviewed before the event. Female respondents interviewed afterwards were more likely to report higher levels of psychological distress (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.08-1.83) and closeness to fathers (aOR, 1.36; 95% Cl, 1.08-1.72). There were no pre-post differences in substance use. Respondents closest to terrorist sites were most affected. Conclusion: Young adults who did not directly witness the events of September 11 experienced reactions that were multifaceted and transient-except for persisting trust in government.
引用
收藏
页码:572 / 578
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BOWLING ALONE COLLAP
[2]  
[Anonymous], NATL LONGITUDINAL ST
[3]  
BRESLAU N, 1991, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V48, P216
[4]  
Dunn L. M., 1981, PEABODY PICTURE VOCA
[5]   Psychological sequelae of the September 11 terrorist attacks in New York City. [J].
Galea, S ;
Ahern, J ;
Resnick, H ;
Kilpatrick, D ;
Bucuvalas, M ;
Gold, J ;
Vlahov, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (13) :982-987
[6]   The effects of terrorism on teens' perceptions of dying: The new world is riskier than ever [J].
Halpern-Felsher, BL ;
Millstein, SG .
JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH, 2002, 30 (05) :308-311
[7]   The threat of biological weapons - Prophylaxis and mitigation of psychological and social consequences [J].
Holloway, HC ;
Norwood, AE ;
Fullerton, CS ;
Engel, CC ;
Ursano, RJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1997, 278 (05) :425-427
[8]   60,000 disaster victims speak: Part I. An empirical review of the empirical literature, 1981-2001 [J].
Norris, FH ;
Friedman, MJ ;
Watson, PJ ;
Byrne, CM ;
Diaz, E ;
Kaniasty, K .
PSYCHIATRY-INTERPERSONAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2002, 65 (03) :207-239
[9]   Psychiatric disorders among survivors of the Oklahoma City bombing [J].
North, CS ;
Nixon, SJ ;
Shariat, S ;
Mallonee, S ;
McMillen, JC ;
Spitznagel, EL ;
Smith, EM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (08) :755-762
[10]   Research on the mental health effects of terrorism [J].
North, CS ;
Pfefferbaum, B .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (05) :633-636