Comparative effects of amiodipine and nifedipine GITS during treatment and after missing two doses

被引:20
作者
Hernández, RH
Armas-Hernández, MJ
Chourio, JAC
Armas-Padilla, MC
López, L
Alvarez, M
Pacheco, B
机构
[1] Univ Centroccidental Lisandro Alvarado, Sch Med, Hypertens Clin, Clin Pharmacol Unit, Barquisimeto, Venezuela
[2] Univ Zulia, Sch Med, Pharmacol Sect, Dept Physiol Sci, Maracaibo 4011, Venezuela
[3] Policlin Santiago Leon, Caracas, Venezuela
[4] Cardiovasc Ctr Dr Mariano Alvarez, Maturin, Venezuela
关键词
amlodipine; nifedipine GITS; ambulatory blood pressure monitoring; compliance;
D O I
10.1097/00126097-200102000-00008
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective To compare the antihypertensive efficacy of amlodipine and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) measured by office and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) during treatment and, after patients have missed two doses. Method After a single blind run-in 4-week placebo period, 58 patients were randomly allocated to amlodipine (5 mg/daily, n = 30) or nifedipine GITS (30 mg/daily; n = 28) in a double-blind, double dummy fashion. Patients received active medication for 4 weeks. Then, to simulate failure of compliance, patients received two single blinded doses of placebo. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was carried out at the end of run-in placebo phase, the first day, the last day of active treatment and up to 72 h after the last active dose. Results Diastolic blood pressure was controlled in 61.9% patients on amlodipine and 52.9% on nifedipine GITS. Reductions in blood pressure were similar in both groups. ABPM showed significant reduction in blood pressure from the first day in the nifedipine GITS group, while amlodipine group had marginal effect. Peak reduction in systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 26/15mmHg at 5-6h after ingestion of amlodipine tablets. The trough reduction was 22/13mmHg; with a trough-to-peak ratio of 84.61% for systolic and 86.67% for diastolic blood pressure. Peak reduction in systolic/ diastolic blood pressure with nifedipine GITS was 19/15 mmHg and the trough reduction was 21/17 mmHg, giving a trough-to-peak ratio of 100% for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. When patients received placebo after 4 weeks of active treatment, simulating a compliance failure, amlodipine maintained reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure for at least up to 72 h after the last active dose, maintaining 57.71 % of the effect for systolic blood pressure and 60.00% for diastolic blood pressure. In contrast, nifedipine GITS effect was rapidly lost during this study phase, with a reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure of only 14-16%, 72 h after the last active dose. Conclusion This study showed that amlodipine and nifedipine GITS reduce blood pressure to about the same extent during chronic treatment. In the case of compliance failure, such as missing one or two doses, amlodipine maintained significant and important antihypertensive effect with the trough-to-peak ratio still over 50% 72 h after the last active dose. On the other hand, the coverage of nifedipine GITS was limited to about 36 h after the last active dose. (C) 2001 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 57
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] EFFECTS OF AMLODIPINE, A LONG-ACTING DIHYDROPYRIDINE CALCIUM-ANTAGONIST IN AGING HYPERTENSION - PHARMACODYNAMICS IN RELATION TO DISPOSITION
    ABERNETHY, DR
    GUTKOWSKA, J
    WINTERBOTTOM, LM
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1990, 48 (01) : 76 - 86
  • [2] Electronic pill-boxes in the evaluation of antihypertensive treatment compliance:: Comparison of once daily versus twice daily regimen
    Andrejak, M
    Genes, N
    Vaur, L
    Poncelet, P
    Clerson, P
    Carré, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2000, 13 (02) : 184 - 190
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1997, ARCH INTERN MED, V157, P2413, DOI [10.1001/archinte.1997.00440420033005, DOI 10.1001/ARCHINTE.1997.00440420033005]
  • [4] A COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF AMLODIPINE AND FELODIPINE ER - PHARMACOKINETIC AND PHARMACODYNAMIC INDEXES
    BAINBRIDGE, AD
    HERLIHY, O
    MEREDITH, PA
    ELLIOTT, HL
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 45 (05) : 425 - 430
  • [5] Chalmers J, 1999, J HYPERTENS, V17, P151
  • [6] CROSS BW, 1993, BRIT J CLIN PRACT, V47, P237
  • [7] NIFEDIPINE - INDIVIDUAL-RESPONSES AND CONCENTRATION-EFFECT RELATIONSHIPS
    DONNELLY, R
    ELLIOTT, HL
    MEREDITH, PA
    KELMAN, AW
    REID, JL
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 1988, 12 (04) : 443 - 449
  • [8] CONCENTRATION-EFFECT ANALYSIS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG RESPONSE - FOCUS ON CALCIUM-ANTAGONISTS
    DONNELLY, R
    ELLIOTT, HL
    MEREDITH, PA
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1994, 26 (06) : 472 - 485
  • [9] CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS OF VERAPAMIL, NIFEDIPINE AND DILTIAZEM
    ECHIZEN, H
    EICHELBAUM, M
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1986, 11 (06) : 425 - 449
  • [10] ELLIOTT HL, 1995, J HYPERTENS, V13, P279