PELD score and posttransplant outcome in pediatric liver transplantation: A retrospective study of 100 recipients

被引:52
作者
Bourdeaux, C [1 ]
Tri, TT [1 ]
Gras, J [1 ]
Sokal, E [1 ]
Otte, JB [1 ]
de Goyet, JD [1 ]
Reding, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catholique Louvain, Pediat Liver Transplant Program, Clin Univ St Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007890-200505150-00060
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Pediatric End-stage Liver Disease (PELD) score is proposed as an objective tool to prioritize children awaiting liver transplantation (LT), higher PELD being associated with increased pre-LT mortality. This study investigated whether PELD may also impact on post-LT results. Methods. PELD was retrospectively analyzed in 100 pediatric recipients of a primary LT from living-related (n = 49) or postmortem donors (PMD, n = 5 1). The main pre-LT diagnosis was biliary atresia (n = 64), hepatic malignancy and fulminant hepatitis cases being excluded. PELD was calculated in all patients at the time of pre-LT assessment. Considering the median delay of 117 days between listing and LT in the PMD subgroup, a second PELD was calculated at the time of LT, allowing the determination of a Delta PELD during the waiting period. PMD grafts were allocated using an allocation system taking into account waiting times as well as medical urgency, operative at EuroTransplant. Results. Overall 5-year actuarial patient and graft survivals were 96% and 91%, respectively. PELD at listing (13.3 +/- 9.7) showed a normal statistical distribution. PELD scores at listing and at LT were not found to significantly impact on post-LT outcome (NS). In contrast, higher Delta PELD might be associated with lower posttransplant patient survival (p = 0.094). Conclusions. The results of this retrospective analysis suggest that giving priority to high PELD recipients may not result in worsening post-LT outcome. Accordingly, these data support such "sickest children first" allocation policy, which should contribute to reduce pre-LT mortality without worsening post-LT results and increasing organ waste.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1276
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Predicting outcome after liver transplantation: Utility of the model for end-stage liver disease and a newly derived discrimination function [J].
Desai, NM ;
Mange, KC ;
Crawford, MD ;
Abt, PL ;
Frank, AM ;
Markmann, JW ;
Velidedeoglu, E ;
Chapman, WC ;
Markmann, JF .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (01) :99-106
[2]  
*ELAS, EUR MAN, pCH5
[3]   Impact of surgical and immunological parameters in pediatric liver transplantation - A multivariate analysis in 500 consecutive recipients of primary grafts [J].
Evrard, V ;
Otte, JB ;
Sokal, E ;
Rochet, JS ;
Haccourt, F ;
Gennari, F ;
Latinne, D ;
Jamart, J ;
Reding, R .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (02) :272-280
[4]   Results of the first year of the new liver allocation plan [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Edwards, E ;
Harper, A ;
Merion, R ;
Wolfe, R .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (01) :7-15
[5]   The new liver allocation system: Moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Harper, A ;
McDiarmid, SV ;
Lake, J ;
Edwards, E ;
Merion, R ;
Wolfe, R ;
Turcotte, J ;
Teperman, L .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 8 (09) :851-858
[6]   Liver transplant waiting time does not correlate with waiting list mortality: Implications for liver allocation policy [J].
Freeman, RB ;
Edwards, EB .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 6 (05) :543-552
[7]   A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease [J].
Kamath, PS ;
Wiesner, RH ;
Malinchoc, M ;
Kremers, W ;
Therneau, TM ;
Kosberg, CL ;
D'Amico, G ;
Dickson, ER ;
Kim, WR .
HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 33 (02) :464-470
[8]  
Kane R, 2001, TRANSPLANTATION, V72, P463
[9]   Development of a pediatric end-stage liver disease score to predict poor outcome in children awaiting liver transplantation [J].
McDiarmid, SV ;
Anand, R ;
Lindblad, AS .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (02) :173-181
[10]   Pediatric liver transplantation with cadaveric or living related donors: Comparative results in 90 elective recipients of primary grafts [J].
Reding, R ;
de Goyet, JD ;
Delbeke, I ;
Sokal, E ;
Jamart, J ;
Janssen, M ;
Otte, JB .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1999, 134 (03) :280-286