Nonionic intravenous contrast agent does not cause clinically significant artifacts to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with lung cancer

被引:14
作者
An, Young-Sil [1 ]
Sheen, Seung S. [2 ]
Oh, Y. J. [2 ]
Hwang, Sung C. [2 ]
Yoon, Joon-Kee [1 ]
机构
[1] Ajou Univ, Dept Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Suwon 443721, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Sch Med, Suwon 441749, South Korea
关键词
lung cancer; F-18-FDG PET/CT; intravenous contrast; contrast-related artifact; nodal stage;
D O I
10.1007/s12149-007-0066-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective This study was performed to evaluate the effects of intravenous (i.v.) contrast agent on semi-quantitative values and lymph node (LN) staging of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18-FDG PET/CT) in patients with lung cancer. Methods Thirty-five patients with lung cancer were prospectively included. Whole-body PET and nonenhanced CT images were acquired 60min following the i.v. injection of 370MBq F-18-FDG and subsequently, enhanced-CT images were acquired with the i.v. administration of 400mg iodinated contrast agent without positional change. PET images were reconstructed with both nonenhanced and enhanced CTs, and the maximum and average standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVave) calculated from lung masses, LNs, metastatic lesions, and normal structures were compared. To evaluate the effects of the i.v. contrast agent on LN staging, we compared the LN status on the basis of SUVs (cut-offs; SUVmax = 3.5, SUVave = 3.0). Results The mean differences of SUVmax in normal structures between enhanced and nonenhanced PET/CT were 15.23% +/- 13.19% for contralateral lung, 8.53% +/- 6.11% for aorta, 5.85% +/- 4.99% for liver, 5.47% +/- 6.81% for muscle, and 2.81% +/- 3.05% for bone marrow, and those of SUVave were 10.17% +/- 9.00%, 10.51% +/- 7.89%, 4.95% +/- 3.89%, 5.66% +/- 9.12%, and 2.49% +/- 2.50%, respectively. The mean differences of SUVmax between enhanced and nonenhanced PET/CT were 5.89% +/- 3.92% for lung lesions (n = 41), 6.27% +/- 3.79% for LNs (n = 76), and 3.55% +/- 3.38% for metastatic lesions (n = 35), and those of SUVave were 3.22% +/- 3.01%, 2.86% +/- 1.71%, and 2.33% +/- 3.95%, respectively. Although one LN status changed from benign to malignant because of contrast-related artifact, there was no up- or down-staging in any of the patients after contrast enhancement. Conclusions An i.v. contrast agent may be used in PET/CT without producing any clinically significant artifact.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 592
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ALBERTYN L E, 1989, Australasian Radiology, V33, P29, DOI 10.1111/j.1440-1673.1989.tb03231.x
[2]   COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY OF THORAX AND ABDOMEN - PRELIMINARY REPORT [J].
ALFIDI, RJ ;
HAAGA, J ;
MEANEY, TF ;
MACINTYRE, WJ ;
GONZALEZ, L ;
TARAR, R ;
ZELCH, MG ;
BOLLER, M ;
COOK, SA ;
JELDEN, G .
RADIOLOGY, 1975, 117 (02) :257-264
[3]   Non-small cell lung cancer: Dual-modality PET/CT in preoperative staging [J].
Antoch, G ;
Stattaus, J ;
Nemat, AT ;
Marnitz, S ;
Beyer, T ;
Kuehl, H ;
Bockisch, A ;
Debatin, JF ;
Freudenberg, LS .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 229 (02) :526-533
[4]  
Antoch G, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, p56S
[5]   Whole-body positron emission tomography-CT: Optimized CT using oral and IV contrast materials [J].
Antoch, G ;
Freudenberg, LS ;
Stattaus, J ;
Jentzen, W ;
Mueller, SP ;
Debatin, JF ;
Bockisch, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (06) :1555-1560
[6]  
Antoch G, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P1339
[7]   The additional value of PET/CT over PET in FDG imaging of oesophageal cancer [J].
Bar-Shalom, R ;
Guralnik, L ;
Tsalic, M ;
Leiderman, M ;
Frenkel, A ;
Gaitini, D ;
Ben-Nun, A ;
Keidar, Z ;
Israel, O .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2005, 32 (08) :918-924
[8]  
BEURENER FA, 1981, ROFO FORTSCHR RONTG, V134, P656
[9]  
Beyer T, 2000, J NUCL MED, V41, P1369
[10]  
Beyer T, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, p25S